Analysis of caesarean rate and indications of university hospitals in sub-Saharan African developing countries using Robson classification system: the case of Cocody’s hospital center, Abidjan-Cote d’Ivoire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161661Keywords:
Caesarean section rate, Caesarean indications, Robson classification, Tertiary maternity, Developing country, Cote d’IvoireAbstract
Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it has become imperative to monitor caesarean rates in hospitals since these rates continue to increase; WHO recommends this monitoring by the Robson’s system. The study objective was to describe caesarean rates in a level 3 maternity of developing country using this system, to identify the groups likely increase overall rate of caesarean.
Methods: A retrospective and comparative study made in Cocody University Hospital Center (Abidjan-Cote d’Ivoire) over a period of twelve years. A total of 21,067 women who delivered during this period by caesarean were included.
Results: The overall rate of caesarean during the study period was 38.7% with a significant increase from Period I to Period II (34.8 vs. 41.7%; p ˂0.000). The subgroup 2 (nulliparas, single cephalic term pregnancy, caesarean before labor) made the greatest contribution to the overall CS rate with an increase of +5% (10.1 vs. 15.1%; p˂0,000). Women with previous CS (groups 5, 7, 8, 9, 10) increased the caesarean rate of +3.4% (7 vs. 10.4%; p˂0.000). The group 6 increased it of +2.9% (4.7 vs 7.6%; p˂0.000). Caesarean indications were dominated by fetal acute distress (24.5 vs. 22.6%; p˂0,000), then followed by fetal-pelvic disproportion (21.8 vs. 10.7%), severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (13.5 vs. 17.5%; p˂0.000), scarred uterus and breech presentation.
Conclusions: Robson classification has identified the groups led to a significant increase in caesarean rates in our service and therefore has good focus our preventive actions.
Metrics
References
Betran AP, Torloni MR, zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57.
Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classification for caesarean section: a systematic review. PloS ONE. 2011;6(1):e14566.
Cissé CT, N’Gon PM, Guissé A, Faye EO, Mareau JC. Reflexions sur l’évolution des taux de césarienne en milieu africain: exemple du CHU de Dakar entre 1992 et 2001. Gynécol Obstét Fertil. 2004;32:210-7.
Loué VA, Dia JML, Effoh ND, Adjoby CR, Konan K J, Gbary AE, et al. Management and prognosis of uterine rupture during labor in an under-medicalized country: about 513 cases collected at the Cocody University Hospital Center (Abidjan-Cote d'Ivoire). Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(5):1277-82 .
Daniel CN, Singh S. Caesarean delivery: An experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):18-24.
Some Der A, Ouattara S, Barro D, Traoré A, Bamabara M, Dao B. Audit des césariennes en milieu africain. Rwanda Medical Journal. 2010;68(4):32-7.
Lembrouck C, Mottet N, Bourtembourg A, Ramanah R, Riethmuller D. Peut-on diminuer le taux de césarienne dans un CHU de niveau III ? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 1 October 2015. 2015 Sep 30. pii: S0368-2315(15)00207-0.
Le Ray C, Prunet C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Goffinet F, Blondel B. Classification de Robson : un outil d’évaluation des pratiques de césarienne en France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(7):605-13.
Kelly S, Sprague A, Fell DB, Murphy P, Aelick N, Guo Y, et al. Examining Caesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Robson Classification System. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(3):206-14.
Triunfo S, Ferrazzani S, Lanzonne A, Scambia G. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:91-5.
Mossialos E, Allin S, Karras K, Davaki K. An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15:288-95.
UNICEF. Cote d’Ivoire, statistiques. www.unicef.org/french/infobycountry/cotedivoire_statistics.htm. consulté le 16 Avril 2016.
Dumont A, De Bernis L, Bouvier-Colle M.-H, Bréart G. Santé maternelle en Afrique francophone - Estimation du taux attendu de césariennes pour indications maternelles dans une population de femmes enceintes d'Afrique de l'Ouest (enquête MOMA). J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod. 2002;31(1):107-12.
Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260-70.
Loué V, Effoh N, Konan J, Gbary E, Allah C, Kassé R, et al. Vaginal breech delivery: survey of obstetricians in specialization in Cote d’Ivoire. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:651-5.