Fallopian Tube Recanalization (F.T.R): application of Interventional Radiology (I.R) post hysterosalpingography in management of female infertility at rural hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182968Keywords:
Fallopian tube recanalization, Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Interventional Radiology, Tubal blockageAbstract
Background: Infertility is defined as inability to conceive even after 1 year of unprotected intercourse. Tubal blockage is one of the common causes of primary as well as secondary infertility in females. Fallopian tube recanalization (FTR) an interventional radiological procedure is one of the most promising, effective, minimally invasive and cost-effective technique in patients having infertility owing to tubal blockage. The aim is to study the cause, hysterosalpingography findings, and outcome of fallopian tube recanalization by interventional radiological procedure in patients with tubal-blockage presenting with infertility.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study of women with primary or secondary infertility presenting to interventional radiology department. The patients either had already undergone hysterosalpingography (HSG) or came for HSG. Fallopian tube recanalization was done as per institutional protocol. Hysterosalpingography abnormalities, outcome and complications of fallopian tube recanalization procedure were studied.
Results: In this study of 87 patients unilateral or bilateral tubal blockages were seen in 16 and 24 patients respectively. Majority of the patients had Segment I proximal block. Bilateral recanalization could be successfully done in 12 patients (24 tubes) with bilateral Proximal Tubal Blockage (PTO). Unilateral recanalization was possible in 12 patients (tubes) with unilateral proximal block and 8 tubes with bilateral proximal tubal block. 10 tubes with PTO could not be recanalized. 5 cases diagnosed with bilateral Distal Tubal Block (DTO), recanalization was not attempted and were referred for appropriate gynecological management. Minor complications were noted in 8 patients while no major procedure related complications were observed.
Conclusions: Fallopian tube recanalization (by interventional radiology procedure) in patients with fallopian tube blockage diagnosed on HSG is found to be cost effective, minimally invasive and have low complication rate. It is associated with excellent outcome in terms of technical success and improved conception rate.
References
Chen LM, Wang RS, Lee YF, Liu NC, Chang YJ, Wu CC, et al. Subfertility with defective folliculogenesis in female mice lacking testicular orphan nuclear receptor 4. Mol Endocrinol. 2008 Apr;22(4):858-67.
Schankath AC, Fasching N, Urech-Ruh C, Hohl MK, Kubik-Huch RA. Hysterosalpingography in the workup of female infertility: indications, technique and diagnostic findings. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(5):475-83.
Thurmond AS, Rösch J, Patton PE, Burry KA, Novy M. Fluoroscopic transcervical fallopian tube catheterization for diagnosis and treatment of female infertility caused by tubal obstruction. Radiographics. 1988;8(4):621-40.
Honoré GM, Holden AE, Schenken RS. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril. 1999 May;71(5):785-95.
Hall LD, Brodie MF. Fallopian Tube Interventions In: Mauro MA, Murphy KPJ, Thomson KR, Venbrux AC, Robert A, eds. Morgan Image-Guided Interventions E-Book: Expert Radiology Series. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders; 2014:1117.
Hunt JL, Lynn AA. Histologic features of surgically removed fallopian tubes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Aug;126(8):951-5.
Kitchin JD 3rd, Nunley WC Jr, Bateman BG. Surgical management of distal tubal occlusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Sep;155(3):524-31.
Muzii L, Marana R, Mancuso S. Distal fallopian tube occlusion: false diagnosis with hysterosalpingography in cases of tubal diverticula. Radiol. 1996 May;199(2):469-71.
Al Subhi T, Al Jashnmi RN, Al Khaduri M, Gowri V. Prevalence of Tubal Obstruction in the Hysterosalpingogram of Women with Primary and Secondary Infertility. J Reprod Infertil. 2013;14(4):214-6.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):302-7.
Ramalingappa A, Yashoda. A study on tubal recanalization. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(2):179-83.
Houston JG, Machan LS. Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: technical success and outcome of fluoroscopic transcervical fallopian tube recanalization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;21(1):31-5.
He C, Ma X. Distal fallopian tube recanalization using ozone treatment: a clinical study in two hundred tubal obstruction Chinese patients. Int J Clinical Exp Med. 2015;8(2):2958-61.
Allahbadia GN, Merchant R. Fallopian tube recanalization: lessons learnt and future challenges. Women’s Health (Lond). 2010 Jul;6(4):531-48.
Thurmond AS, Machan LS, Maubon AJ, Rouanet JP, Hovsepian DM, Moore A, et al. A review of selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterization. Radiographics. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):1759-68.
Hayashi M, Hoshimoto K, Ohkura T. Successful conception following Fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients with a unilateral proximally occluded tube and a contralateral patent tube. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):96-9.
Knuttinen MG, Jajko R, Scoccia B. Fluoroscopic Tubal Recanalization in Tubal Factor Related Infertility. Seminars Intervent Radiol 2014;31(3):269-71.
Al-Omari MH, Obeidat N, Elheis M, Khasawneh RA, Gharaibeh MM. Factors affecting pregnancy rate following fallopian tube recanalization in women with proximal fallopian tube obstruction. J Clinical Med. 2018;7(5):110.
Lang EK, Dunaway HH. Recanalization of obstructed fallopian tube by selective salpingography and transvaginal bougie dilatation: outcome and cost analysis. Fertil Steril. 1996 Aug;66(2):210-5.
Anil G, Tay KH, Loh SF, Yong TT, Ong CL, Tan BS. Fluoroscopy-guided transcervical, selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalisation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Nov;31(8):746-50.
