Vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) versus emergency repeat cesarean section at teaching hospitals in India: an ICMR task force study


  • B. S. Dhillon Division of Reproductive Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi-110029, India
  • Nomita Chandhiok Division of Reproductive Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi-110029, India
  • Bharti S. I.O.G., Chennai, India
  • Bhatia P. Kasturba Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Coyaji K.J. KEM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Das M.C. Guwahati Medical College, Guwahati, India


Cesarean section, VBAC, Trail of labor, Maternal morbidity


Background: Objective of current study was to study the outcome of trial of vaginal birth after Previous Cesarean Section (PCS) and indications for emergency repeat cesarean section at teaching hospitals in India.

Methods: Prospective data was recorded on management practices, associated complications and mortality for a period of 8 months in 2005-2006 at 30 medical colleges/teaching hospitals for delivery.

Results: A total of 155863 deliveries occurred during the study duration, there were 28.1% (n=43824) cesarean section and (10.1%) (n=15664) were the number of previous cesarean section.  In 84% (n=13151) had repeat cesarean delivery and 2513 (16%) delivered vaginally. A trial of labor was planned in 4035 (25.8%) women. The success rate of VBAC was 62.3% with 2513 women had successful vaginal delivery and 1522 (37.7%) delivered by emergency repeat cesarean section. Major indication of emergency cesarean section was CPD (52.9%), foetal distress (25.8%), severe PIH/eclampsia (5.0%), previous 2 CS (0.7%), APH (1.4%) and others (2.7%).  In majority, surgical technique was conventional and in 3.7% the Misgav-Ladach technique was used. Scar dehiscence and surgical complications were observed in 5.4% and 4.0% of cases respectively. Blood transfusion was given in 7.0% and post-operative complications were seen in 6.8%. Perinatal and maternal mortality was 18.0/1000 and 257/100000 deliveries respectively.

Conclusions: Safety in childbirth for women with prior cesarean is a major public health concern. Repeat caesarean section and planned vaginal birth after cesarean section are both associated with benefits and harms and correct management represents one of the most significant and challenging issues in obstetric practice.  


Van Bogaert LJ. Mode of delivery after one cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2004;87:9-13.

Craigin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1916;104:1-3.

Miller AD, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after caesarean: a 10 year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:255-8.

Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465-70.

Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:332-7.

Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a metaanalysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1187-97.

Editorial. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. Br Med J. 2004;329:359-60.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Catherine et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior caesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581-9.

Vardhan S, Behera RC, Sandhu GS, Singh A, Bandhu HC. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(4):320-3.

Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79:151-8.

Coassolo KM, Stamilio DM, Pare E, Peipert JF. Safety and efficacy of VBAC at or beyond 40 weeks gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:700-6.

Bhat BPR, Savant R, Kamath A. Outcome of a post caesarean pregnancy in a tertiary center of a developing country. J Clin Diag Res. 2010:4(1):2005-9.

Dhall K, Mittal SC, Grover V et al. Childbirth following primarycesarean section-evaluation of a scoring system. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1987;25:199-201.

Singh T, Clark SC, Toffel S. Changes in cesarean delivery in the United States, 1988 and 1993. Birth 1995;22:63-7.

Mc Mohan MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689-95.

Aisien AO, Oronsaye AU. Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institute in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(8):886-90.

Chhabra S, Arora G. Delivery in women with one previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(4):304-7.

Goldman G, Pineault R, Potvin L, Blais R, BIlodeau H. Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Am J Public Health. 1993;8:1104-8.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985 Aug;2(8452):436-7.

Ghaffari A, Ahmed BB. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;92(1):38-42.

Peaceman A, Gersnoviez R, Landon M et al. The MFMU cesarean registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;195(4):1127-31.

G. Puliyath. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a descriptive study from Middle East. Intern J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;12(2):20.

Dunn C, O’Herlihy. Comparison of maternal satisfaction following vaginal delivery after caesarean section and caesarean section after previous vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;121(1):56-60.






Original Research Articles