Cervical length by ultrasound as a predictor of preterm labour

Jasmina Begum, Ashok Kumar Behera

Abstract


Background: Objective of current study was to evaluate cervical length by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography at 14-24 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic women for predicting women at risk of preterm delivery and to find out the one method which is more accurate of the two.  

Methods: Fifty one women were enrolled in this prospective study. Women with cervical incompetence, multiple gestation, maternal medical diseases, previous cervical surgery were excluded. Each woman underwent a transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurement. The period of gestation at delivery in these women was then correlated with sonographic findings. Statistical comparisons were made between the two ultrasonographic methods.  

Results: Preterm delivery occurred in 37.2% of the women. By transabdominal sonography it was seen that with cervical length of less than 3cm at 14-24 weeks, majority (63.15%) delivered preterm. The mean cervical length of cases who delivered preterm was 3.3 ± 0.9 cm. Whereas the mean cervical length of cases that had term delivery was 3.5 ± 0.6, and majority (86.2%) had cervical length of more than 3 cm, similar trend was also seen with transvaginal sonography, majority (78.9%) of cases with cervical length of less than 3 cm delivered preterm. The mean cervical length of cases who delivered at term was 3.1 ± 0.4 and the mean cervical length of cases who delivered preterm was 2.85 ± 0.5 cm. There was definitive positive correlation between cervical length at 14-24 weeks and period of gestation at delivery. On analysis, prediction of risk of preterm delivery by cervical length cut off value on the basis of the median at earlier weeks, 35 mm for transabdominal and 30 mm for transvaginal sonography, it was observed that transabdominal sonography with a sensitivity of 63.15% and specificity of 71.8%, predicted relative risk of 2.47 which was not significant (P <0.1) but transvaginal sonography with sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 81.2 predicted relative risk of 5.35 which was significant (P <0.001).

Conclusions: Transvaginal ultrasonography seems to be the optimal method for assessment of cervical length in the second trimester and for screening for spontaneous preterm delivery.


Keywords


Preterm delivery, Cervical length, Transabdominal sonography (TAS), Transvaginal sonography (TVS)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berkowith GS, Papiernick E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:414-43.

Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Davis RO, Cutter GR, DuBard MB, Corliss DK, et al. Warning symptoms, uterine contractions and cervical examination findings in women at risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar;162(3):748-54.

Steer P. The epidemiology of preterm labour: why have advances not equated to reduced incidences? Br J Ostet Gynecol. 2006;113:1-3.

Armson BA, Dodds L. Prediction of preterm birth in a population of Canadian women. Int J Gynecol Obset. 1994;46(Suppl 2):93.

Gomez R, Glasso M, Romero R, Mazor M, Sorokin Y, Gonçalves L, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as the predictor of likelihood premature delivery in patients with preterm labour and intact membrane. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:956-64.

Vogel I, Grove J, Thorsen P, Moestrup SK, Uldbjerg N, Møller HJ. Preterm delivery predicted by soluble CD 163 and CRP in women with symptoms of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112:737-42.

Goldenberg RL, Hauth JC, Andrew WW. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery. N Eng J Med. 2000 May;18:342.

Leitch H. Secondary predictors of preterm labour. Br J Ostet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;112:48-50.

Brown JE, Thieme GA, Shah DM, Fleischer AC, Boehm FH. Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:721-6.

Goldenberg RL, Lams JD, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Mowad A, Cooper RL, et al. The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs. standard risk factors in predicting all early and spontaneous preterm births NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Publ Health. 1998;88:233-8.

Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Okai T, Takahashi K. A Prospective clinical study for the prediction of preterm delivery in a low risk population. J Mat Fetal Med. 1996 Nov;6:148-51.

Boties D, Papagianni V, Vitoratos V, Makrakis E, Aravantinos L, Creatsas G. Prediction of preterm delivery by sonographic estimation of cervical length. Biol Neonate. 2005;88(1):42-5.

Anderson HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SB, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:859-67.

Berghella V, Talcci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;21:140-4.

Heath VC, Souka AP, Southhall TR, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 28 weeks of gestation, prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12;312-7.

Gamze C, Cidgem S, Senol K, Filiz A. Evaluation of length of cervix by transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography in second trimester. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2005;55:318-21.

Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ. The length of cervix and risk of spontaneous PTD. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:567.

Pietryaga M, Brazert J, Wender-Ozegowska E, Mitkowska H, Persona-Sliwińska A, Biczysko R. Cervical ultrasound assessment for predicting the risk of premature delivery. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2003 Jul-Sep;7(3 Suppl 1):157-65.

Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Pitaksakorn J. Cervical length in normal pregnancy as measured by transvaginal sonography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1995;58:313-5.

Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomaraswamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:305-22.