DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20212963

Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and liquid‑based cytology: a study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bengaluru

Chaitra Krishna, Savitha Chandraiah, Chandana Krishna

Abstract


Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth commonest cancer affecting women worldwide and the second most common cancer in women aged 15-44 years. The Papanicolaou (Pap) smear has been the cornerstone of screening for cervical neoplasm for the last 50 years. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) was introduced in mid-1990s as an alternative technique to process cervical samples has many benefits over Pap. A new second generation technique, Liquiprep was introduced after a decade has the advantage of a much lower cost. However, the information available on second generation liquid based cytology is limited. The objective was to look for the efficacy of LBC and to compare it to that of conventional cytology.

Methods: This hospital based comparative study was undertaken 100 women who attended gynaecology OPD during 2017 at a tertiary care hospital in Bengaluru. Two cervical smears were simultaneously prepared from each subject, one for Pap smear and another for LBC followed by colposcopy and biopsy.

Results: Among the study subjects, 89% of Pap smear analysis and 100% of smears in LBC showed satisfactory smear. Cytological abnormality was detected in 11% and 21% in pap and LBC, respectively. The present study showed higher sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 75% by LBC when compared to Pap smear (55% and 100% respectively).

Conclusions: The present study showed that liquid based cytology is better in detecting cervical lesions when compared to conventional smear.

 


Keywords


Papanicolaou smear, Liquid‑based cytology, Cervical cancer, Screening, Tertiary care centre

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):359-86.

Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(5):1133-45.

Mallath MK, Taylor DG, Badwe RA, Rath GK, Shanta V, Pramesh CS, et al. The growing burden of cancer in India: epidemiology and social context. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(6):205-12.

Cuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, Tsu V, Ronco G, Mayrand MH, et al. Overview of human papillomavirus‑based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine. 2008;26(10):29-41.

Papanicolaou GN, Traut HF. The diagnostic value of vaginal smears in carcinoma of the uterus. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(3):211-24.

Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicalou’s test in screening and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities; a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(10):810-9.

Strander B, Andersson-Ellström A, Milsom I, Rådberg T, Ryd W. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program: a prospective randomized study. Cancer. 2007;111(5):285-91.

Klinkamer PJJM, Meerding WJ, Rosier PFWM, Hanselaar AGJM, et al. Liquid based cervical cytology. Cancer. 2003;99(5):263-71.

Shobana R, Saranya B. Comparison of conventional papanicolaou smear and liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Int J Sci Stud. 2019;6(12):64-73.

Jeyakumar AM, Mohanapu S. A comparison of cervical cancer screening methods: pap smear, liquid based cytology and VIA VILI. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(5):1738-44.

Pankaj S, Nazneen S, Kumari S, Kumari A, Kumari A, Kumari J, et al. Comparison of conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology: A study of cervical cancer screening at a tertiary care center in Bihar. Indian J Cancer. 2018;55(1):80-3.

Singh U, Anjum, Qureshi S, Negi N, Singh N, Goel M, et al. Comparative study between liquid-based cytology and conventional Pap smear for cytological follow up of treated patients of cancer cervix. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147(3):263-7.

Shanmugapriya N, Devika P. Comparing the effectiveness of liquid based cytology with conventional PAP smear and colposcopy in screening for cervical cancer and it’s correlation with histopathological examination: a prospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(12):5336-40.

Dhananjaya C, Kumari MK. Comparison of manual liquid based cytology and conventional pap smear in cervical cancer screening. Nat J Lab Med. 2017;6(2):32-7.

Bolick D, Hellman D. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system. ActaCytol. 1998;42(1):209-13.

Papillo J, Zarka M, John T. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice-a seven-month, 16,314-case experience in Northern Vermont. Acta Cytol. 1998;42(1):203-8.

Carpenter A, Davey D. ThinPrep Pap test-performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital. Cancer. 1999;87(3):105-12.

Rosario LAD, Kabawat SE. Performance of a fluid based thin layer Papanicolaou smear method in the clinical setting of an independent lab and outpatient screening of population in New England. Arch Path Lab Med. 1999;123(9):817-21.

Weintraub J, Morabia A. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000;22(1):52-9.

Hutchinson M, Cassin C, Ball H. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;96(3):300-5.

Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SL. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(2):278-84.

Wang T, Chen H, Yang Y, Tsou M. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology. J Formos Med Assoc. 1999;98(7):500-5.

Sherwani RK, Khan T, Akhtar K, Zeba A, Siddiqui FA, Rahman K, et al. Conventional Pap smear and liquid based cytology for cervical cancer screening-a comparative study. J Cytol. 2007;24(4):167-72.

Behtash N, Nazari Z, Khaniki M, Zendedel K, Fakor F, Shariat M. Liquiprep a new liquid based cervical cytology method in comparison with conventional pap smear in developing countries; Res J Biolog Sci. 2008;3(6):627-30.

Kavatkar AN, Nagwanshi CA, Dabak SM. Study of manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology; Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51(2):190-4.