A prospective study of laproscopic paravaginal repair of cystocoele: our experience


  • Amrapali D. Gosavi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tambe Hospital, Sangamner, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India
  • Sanjay P. Dhangar Department of Surgery, SMBT IMSRC, Igatpuri, Nashik, Maharashtra, India http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0932-9414




cystocoele, laproscopic cystocoele repair, paravaginal repair of cystocoele


Background: Cystocele is diagnosed clinically by vaginal examination approaches using the pelvic organ prolapse quantifications system (POP-Q) of classification. Abdominal and laproscopic are now used due to high failure rate involving the transvaginal repair. Laproscopic repair involves approximation of the vaginal sub-epithelial tissue with the Cooper’s ligament using non-absorbable suture.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study from June 2016 to May 2020 over women with symptomatic cystocele of grade ≥2. All patients were preoperatively and post-operatively assessed with quality-of-life questionnaires, pelvic organ prolapse distress inventory-6 (POPDI-6) and urinary distress inventory short form. Clinical examination was done with and without Valsalva maneuver. POP classification was used for grading the prolapse. All patients were assessed for any voiding difficulty after surgery, at one week, three months, six months and 12 months.

Results: The median age of patient was 55.5 years. 90.9% patients presented with urinary symptoms. 54.5% patients underwent hysterectomy. The mean blood loss was 55 cc. The anatomic cure rate for cystocoele was 100% in our study in 1 week, 3 months and 6 months post-operatively. There was significant improvement in the quality-of-life scores. Overall, symptomatic relief was seen in 90.9% patients at first week, 95.4% at 3 months, 95.4% at 6 and 12 months follow up. Urinary symptoms were relieved in all patients at first follow up after 7 days, and 95.4% patients during 3, 6 and 12 months follow up.

Conclusions: Laproscopic paravaginal cystocoele repair is safe, effective and an easy procedure with good results. The procedure is easy to learn and master with low recurrence rates.

Author Biographies

Amrapali D. Gosavi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tambe Hospital, Sangamner, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India

Urologist And Associate Professor, Department Of General Surgery, SMBT IMS & RC, Nashik, India

Sanjay P. Dhangar, Department of Surgery, SMBT IMSRC, Igatpuri, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, Tambe Hopsital, Sangamner


Starič KD, Bukovec P, Zore A, Lukanović A. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: a case report. Urogynaecologia. 2017;30:194.

Hoffman B, Schorge J, Schaffer J, Halvorson J, Bradshaw K, Cunningham F. Williams gynecology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. 2012;647-53.

Hamid R, Losco G. Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Associated Cystitis. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2014;9(3):175-80.

Deng DY, Rutman M, Rodriguez L, Raz S. Correction of cystocele. BJU Int. 2005;96(4):691-709.

Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783-90.

Choi KH, Hong JY. Management of pelvic organ prolapse. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(11):693-702.

Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75-81.

Brubaker L, Maher C, Jacquetin B. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):9-19.

Kobashi KC, Leach GE, Chon J, Govier FE. Continued multicenter followup of cadaveric prolapse repair with sling. J Urol. 2002;168(5):2063-8.

Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(3):357-62.

Safir MH, Gousse AE, Rovner ES, Ginsberg DA, Raz S. 4-Defect repair of grade 4 cystocele. J Urol. 1999;161(2):587-94.

Rodríguez LV, Bukkapatnam R, Shah SM, Raz S. Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique. Urology. 2005;66(5):57-65.

Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2017;389(10067):381-92.

Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1299-304.

Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, Goldberg R. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1357-62.

Allègre L, Callewaert G, Alonso S, Cornille A, Fernandez H, Eglin G, de Tayrac R. Long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing trans-obturator vaginal mesh with native tissue repair in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):745-53.

Colombo M, Vitobello D, Proietti F, Milani R. Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. BJOG. 2000;107(4):544-51.

Handel LN, Frenkl TL, Kim YH. Results of cystocele repair: a comparison of traditional anterior colporrhaphy, polypropylene mesh and porcine dermis. J Urol. 2007;178(1):153-6.

Balzarro M, Rubilotta E, Porcaro AB, Trabacchin N, Sarti A, Cerruto MA, et al. Long-term follow-up of anterior vaginal repair: A comparison among colporrhaphy, colporrhaphy with reinforcement by xenograft, and mesh. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):278-83.

Dmochowski RR, Zimmern PE, Ganabathi K, Sirls L, Leach GE. Role of the four-corner bladder neck suspension to correct stress incontinence with a mild to moderate cystocele. Urology. 1997;49(1):35-40.

Cormio L, Mancini V, Liuzzi G, Lucarelli G, Carrieri G. Cystocele Repair by Autologous Rectus Fascia Graft: the Pubovaginal Cystocele Sling. J Urol. 2015;194(3):721-7.

Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089-105.

Kdous M, Zhioua F. 3-year results of transvaginal cystocele repair with transobturator four-arm mesh: a prospective study of 105 patients. Arab J Urol. 2014;12(4):275-84.

Rosen DM, Shukla A, Cario GM. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):729-34.

Ng CC, Chong CY. The effectiveness of transvaginal anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with polypropylene mesh in the treatment of severe cystoceles. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006;35(12):875-81.

Price N, Jackson SR. Advances in laparoscopic techniques in pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse and incontinence. Maturitas. 2009;62(3):276-80.

Duraisamy KY, Balasubramaniam D, Kakollu A, Chinnusamy P, Periyasamy K. A Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Paravaginal Repair of Cystocele and Associated Pelvic Floor Defects: Our Experience. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(1):82-88.

Bedford ND, Seman EI, O’shea RT. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic repair of cystocoele. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(6):588-92.






Original Research Articles