Efficacy of ultrasonography for structural categorisation of abnormal uterine bleeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20214654Keywords:
Abnormal uterine bleeding, Dysfunctional uterine bleeding, AUB, Leiomyoma, FIGO classification of USGAbstract
Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is defined as bleeding from the uterine corpus endometrium to be precise, the bleeding is abnormal in regularity, volume, frequency, or duration. The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) categorized AUB based on structured medical history, laboratory tests, ultrasound, and or hysteroscopy-based techniques.The classification is based on the phrase "PALM- COEIN", (pronounced “pahm-koin”) of which "PALM" represents polyp, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, malignancy (and hyperplasia) and defines structural pathologies that can be assessed visually. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is the first-line imaging test for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The purpose of this study was to estimate the diagnostic effectiveness of two-dimensional ultrasound (TAS and TVS) in assessing the structural causes of AUB and to compare the histopathological and intraoperative findings with ultrasound.
Methods: It was a prospective observational study. A total of 200 women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding between the age group of 18-55 years were included in study. All patients were subjected to routine investigations for AUB and ultrasonography (USG). Wherever appropriate the findings of USG were compared with intra-operative and histopathology findings.
Results: Diagnostic accuracy of USG was 78.1% with sensitivity and specificity of 88.5% and 60%. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) was 79.4% and 75%. USG is a simple, safe, fast, efficient and tolerable procedure. In diagnosing structural uterine pathology responsible for abnormal uterine bleeding, it has outstanding diagnostic accuracy and should be followed in all such cases.
Conclusions: We cannot be definitive in our approaches always, USG act as a wonderful modality to help us not only in identifying the structural causes but also the functional causes. However, the gold standard of identifying endometrial pathology is histopathology and it can’t be replaced by anything.
References
Hoffman BL. Williams Gynecology. 2nd edition. Mc Graw Hill. 201;219-40.
NICE. Clinical Guideline 44, Heavy menstrual bleeding 2007. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG44FullGui deline.pdf. Accessed on 26 August 2021.
Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS, FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders System. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3-13.
Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Broder M, Munro MG. The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29(5):383-90.
Fraser IS, Langham S, Uhl-Hochgraeber K. Healthrelated quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;4:179-89.
Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:359-63.
Woolcock JG, Critchley HO, Munro MG, Broder MS, Fraser IS. Review of the confusion in current and historical terminology and definitions for disturbances of menstrual bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(6):2269-80.
Taylor HS, Pal L, Seil E. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. In: Speroff L, editor. Speroff’s Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology And Infertility. 9th edition. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer. 2019;509.
Munro MG, Critchley HOD, fraser IS; FIGO Mesntrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:393.
Wheeler KC, Goldstein SR. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(1):11-7.
Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH. Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:102-8.
Jones K, Bourne T. The feasibility of a “one stop” ultrasound-based clinic for the diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:517-21.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology. National evidence-based guidelines. The management of menorrhagia in secondary care. London, England: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology. 1999.
Varadarajan R, Sreekantha SM. Role of hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopausal age group. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(10):1504-9.
Chaudhari KR, Sathe P. Role of diagnostic hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3:666-70.
Goyal BK, Gaur I, Sharma S, Saha A, Das NK. Transvaginal sonography versus hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(2):120-5.
Chhikara A, Bharti A. Role of Hysteroscopy in the Evaluation of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Indian J Appl Res. 2016;6(6).
Singh A, Anant M. The evaluative role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and ultrasonography in abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5:1002-6.
Garg G, Patvekar M, Agarwal K, Bhatia I, Sanghi S. A Study of the Role of Hysteroscopy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J Gynecol Surg. 2017;33(6):226-30.
Panda A, Parulekar SV, Gupta A. diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation. J Obst Gyn India. 1999;175:74-6.
Gianninoto A, Morana C, Campione C. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding. Five year’s experience. Minerva Ginecol. 2003;55:57-61.
VanTrotsenburg M, Wieser F, Naegle F. Diagnostic hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal patients. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 2000;20:21-6.
Guin G, Sandhu SK, Lele A, Khare S. Hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2011;61(5):546-9.
Sunitha CH. A clinical study of diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and its histopathological correlation. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2013;5(3):43-6.
Sinha P, Yadav N, Gupta U. Use of Hysteroscopy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: An Edge Over Histopathological Examination. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2018;68(1):45-50.
Matteson KA, Raker CA, Pinto SB, Scott DM, Frishman GN. Women presenting to an emergency facility with abnormal uterine bleeding: patient characteristics and prevalence of anemia. J Reprod Med. 2012;57:17.
Venugopalan SK, Pandian NS, Pavani M, Srinivasa RT, Rajini Y, Khadeer SK et al. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding In Reproductive Women: Diagnosis, Management And Treatment. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8(1):42-5.
Mishra D, Sultan S. FIGO’s PALM–COEIN Classification of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Clinico-histopathological Correlation in Indian Setting. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2017;67(2):119-25.
Betha K, Malavatu L, Talasani S. Distribution of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding using new FIGO classification system-PALM COEIN: a rural tertiary hospital based study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(8):3523-7.
Gleeson NC. Cyclic changes in endometrial tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in women with normal menstruation and essential menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(1):178-83.
Wamsteker K. Hysteroscopy in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding in 199 patients. In: Siegler AM, Lindemann HJ, editors. Hysteroscopy: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1984;128-31.
DeWit AC, Vleugels MP, DeKruif JH. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: A valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of structural intra-cavital pathology and endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma? Six year’s of experience with non-clinical diagnostic hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:79-82.
Audimulapu S, Sudeepti M. A comparative diagnostic evaluation of hysteroscopy, transvaginal ultrasonography and histopathological examination in 50 cases of abnormal uterine bleeding. IAIM. 2017;4(8):1-11.
Gowri M, Nair L. A comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy with histopathological examination in detecting endometrial pathology in peri-menopausal and post-menopausal bleeding. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;3(4):76-80.
Pyari JS, Rekha S, Srivastava PK, Goel M, Pandey M. A comparative diagnostic evaluation of hysteroscopy, transvaginal ultrasonography and histopathological examination in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(3):240-3.
Feitosa IM, Feitosa HN, Carvalho FH, Pereira SM, das Chagas Medeiros F. Comparison between transvaginal ultrasonography and sonohysterography in the assessment of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Radiologia Brasileira. 2011;44(3).
Vathanan V, Armar NA. A Comparative Observational Study of the Use of Saline Uterine Hydrosonography for the Diagnosis and Assessment of Uterine Cavity Lesions in Women. Int J Reprod Med. 2016;9317194.
Swathi GR, Natraja MK, Shetty SS. A comparative study of hysteroscopy and transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosis of endometrial pathology in abnormal uterine bleeding. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(5):1772-8.
Dana V, Shlomo F, Israel G, Nizar K, Zeev W. Comparison between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine bleeding. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:143-5.
Nicula R, Diculescu D, Lencu CC, Ciortea R, Bucuri CE, Oltean IA, Trif IA, Mihu D. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography compared to endometrial biopsy for the etiological diagnosis of abnormal perimenopausal bleeding. Clujul Medical. 2017;90(1):33.
