A study of adequacy of informed consent before caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20220167Keywords:
Informed consent, Caesarean section, Questionnaire, KnowledgeAbstract
Background: Informed consent is an ethical and legal requirement and is practiced before all the surgical procedures. Caesarean section is the commonest obstetric surgery so, this study was aimed to assess the adequacy of informed consent in patients who underwent caesarean section at SMGS Hospital, GMC, Jammu.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. A total of 230 patients were included in the study. A pre-tested and pre-validated questionnaire was used for the study. The data were expressed as percentage of proportion.
Results: 230 patients participated in the study. About 96.95% patients knew the name of the procedure. 91.73% patients were informed about the indication of the surgery. 95.21% of the patients were aware about the benefits of surgery and about 93.41% of the patients were knowing risks of surgery. About 83.04% patients were informed about the procedure of the surgery. About 94.78% and 94.34% of the patients were aware about the need for the blood transfusion and future pregnancy options. Only about 4.35% of the patients were informed about the requirement and type of anaesthesia. 22.18% of the patients knew about the choice for alternate procedure and merely 2.18% of the patients were informed about the right to refuse the procedure.
Conclusions: It was found that majority of the patients were well informed about the procedure and the related consequences. Still we can improve some elements of the consent process which can be done by proper awareness and training of health care professionals.
References
Shah P, Thornton I, Hipskind JE. Informed consent. Stat Pearls. 2020;11:20-4.
Latika L, Nanda S, Duhan N, Malik R. Study of adequacy of informed consent in caesarean section in a tertiary care, teaching and research institute of Northern India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:780-4.
World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;326(8452):436-7.
Roberts LJ. Elective section after two sections-where’s the evidence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98(12):1192-202.
Flamm BL. Vaginal Birth after caesarean (VBAC). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15(1):81-92.
NHS guidelines on caesarian section. London (UK): National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2004.
Lawson BL, Harrison KA, Bergstrom S. Maternity care in developing countries. Lawson BL, Harrison KA, Bergstrom S, editors. London: RCOG Press. 2001.
World Health Organization. Managing Complications in pregnancy and child birth. In: Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC). Geneva: WHO. 2003.
David C. Lubansa (UNZA). A study of adequacy of informed consent for caesarean section at the university teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. School of Medicine. 2010;1-38.
Kirane AG, Gaikwad NB, Bhingare PE, Mule VD. Informed” Consent: An audit of informed consent of cesarean section evaluating patient education and awareness. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(6):382-5.
Royal college of obstetricians and gynecologists. Caesarean section. In: Consent Advice 7. 2nd ed. UK: RCOG. 2009.
Ngim NE, Ndifon WO, Umoh MS, Ogunkeyede A. Informed consent for surgery in Nigeria: Is the practice adequate? Glob J Med Sci. 2009;7(1-2):39-42.
