A comparative review of intra-operative hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing vaginal surgeries using tumescent anaesthesia vs conventional techniques

Authors

  • Anu Pathak Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.N. Medical College, Agra, India
  • Saroj Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.N. Medical College, Agra, India
  • Manjari Goel Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.N. Medical College, Agra, India
  • Neha Agrawal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, S.N. Medical College, Agra, India

Keywords:

Tumescent anaesthesia, Vaginal hysterectomy, Hemodynamic changes

Abstract

Background: The objective was to assess intra-operative hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing vaginal surgeries using tumescent anaesthesia vs conventional techniques.

Methods: Study was carried out on 200 patients attending the Obst. & Gynae. Dept. of S.N. Medical College, Agra. According to randomization they were divided into 2 groups: group-a: include 100 patients undergoing vaginal surgery using conventional techniques and group-b: include 100 patients undergoing vaginal surgery using tumescent anaesthesia (25 mol of 2% lignocaine and .5 ml eg. Adrenaline (1:1000 conc.) ease and duration of surgery, blood loss, hemodynamic changes during surgery were recorded and comparison drawn and analysed by statistical analysis.

Results: In our study, time required for completion of surgery in group-a was 21-35 min as in group-b it was 36-50 min. More number of cases had blood loss <100 ml (28%) in group-a while in group b maximum number of cases had blood loss >100 ml (90%0. No significant change in mean blood pressure and heart rate between both groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Tumescent anaesthesia is on safe approach which reduces time of surgery and blood loss during surgery with no significant changes in haemodynamic variables.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Klein JA. Bupivacaine, prilocaine, and ropivacaine. In: Tumescent technique: tumescent anesthesia and microcannular liposuction. Mosby, St. Louis, MO;2000:179-183.

Rudolph H, De Jong. Tumescent Anesthesia: Lidocaine Dosing Dichotomy. International Journal of Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Dermatology 2002;4:3-7.

Sheth SS. Vaginal hysterectomy. Best Practice and Research -Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. Edited by Prof. S. Arulkumaran, (Guest Editors R. Thakar & I. Manyonda) USA. Elsevier Ltd. 2005; Vol. 19(3):307-32.

Sheth SS. The scope of vaginal hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;115:224-30.

Agarwal P. Safe methods for release of severe post burn contracture neck under tumescent local anaesthesia and ketamine. Indian J Plast Surg 2002;37:51-4.

Modstrom H, Stabg K. Plasma lignocaine levels and risk after liposuction with TA. Acta Anaesth Scandi 2005;49:1487-90.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-10

How to Cite

Pathak, A., Singh, S., Goel, M., & Agrawal, N. (2016). A comparative review of intra-operative hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing vaginal surgeries using tumescent anaesthesia vs conventional techniques. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2(3), 379–382. Retrieved from https://www.ijrcog.org/index.php/ijrcog/article/view/112

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles