DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20220568

Transvaginal sonographic cervical length assessment in predicting the outcome of induction of labor

Anju Sreenivas, K. Geetha, M. Subhashini

Abstract


Background: The aim of the study was to assess Bishop Score in women undergoing induction of labor followed by cervical length measurement by transvaginal sonography and to study the role of transvaginal sonographic cervical assessment in predicting outcome of induction of labor.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study carried out in 300 pregnancy women undergoing induction of labor. In all the women, Bishop score was calculated by per vaginal examination and cervical length assessed by transvaginal ultrasound, both prior to induction of labor

Results: This study has demonstrated that in singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor at 37-41 weeks of gestation, successful vaginal delivery within 24hrs of induction occurred in 66.8%. The study has also demonstrated that induction to delivery interval is significantly associated with both the preinduction Bishop score and sonographically measured cervical length, higher the Bishop score and lesser the cervical length, better the likelihood of vaginal delivery within 24 hrs of induction. The best cutoff point for successful induction was ≥3 for Bishop score and ≤2.5 cm for cervical length, which was obtained from the ROC curve.

Conclusions: Cervical length assessment by transvaginal ultrasound was a better predictor of successful induction of labor.

 


Keywords


Bishop score, Cervical length, Induction of labor, Transvaginal ultrasound

Full Text:

PDF

References


Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2013;62 (1):1-10.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2):386-97.

Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Omar R. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(2):227.

Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2):261.

Bueno B, San‐Frutos L, Salazar F, Pérez‐Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, et al. Variables that predict the success of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(11):1093-7.

Faltin-Traub EF, Boulvain M, Faltin DL, Extermann P, Irion O. Reliability of the Bishop score before labour induction at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;112(2):178-81.

Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for Elective induction. Obstet Gynaecol. 1964;24:269-71.

Bansiwal R, Rao R, Mishra N, Kapur V. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;2(4):611-5.

Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Rev. 2001;3:42-9.

Vallikkannu N, Lam WK, Omar SZ, Tan PC. Insulin like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop Score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women. BJOG. 2016;42:25-9.

Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop’s score in labour induction at term: tolerability and prediction of cesarean delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(5):568-73.

Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(6):623-8.

Adelaide C, Joana C, Maria F, Graça R, Olímpia C. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:127-30.

Atal R, Mokharia J, Chauhan M. Study on comparison of transvaginal cervical length and bishop score in predicting successful labour induction. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2016; 18(1):181-4.

Nikbakht R and Hemadi M. Transvaginal cervical length and Bishop score value in predicting successful labor induction with an emphasis on the parity. Int J Pharma Res Allied Sci. 2016;5(2):114-8.

Park KH. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(4): 722-7.

Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(6):521-6.

Shreya MS, Savitha C. Significance of transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length before induction of labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:3702-6.

Kaur P, Kaur M, Rao M, Mohan M. Role of transvaginal sonography in preiduction cervical assessment. Is it helpful? Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(7):1549-54.

Gomez-Laencina AM, Sanchez FG, Gimenez JH, Martinez MS, Valverde Martinez JA, Vizcaino VM. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop in predicting successful labour induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):799-804.

Ware V, Raynor BD. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(5):1030-103.

Ezebialu IU, Eke AC, Eleje GU, Nwachukwu CE. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6: CD010762.

Yang SH, Roh CR, Kim JH. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor. J Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23(3):375-82.