DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161328

Fetal colon diameter as a tool for estimating gestational age in advanced pregnancy in north Indian population: a pilot study

Renu Arora, Nikky Punia, Archana Kumari

Abstract


Background: Conventional Ultrasound dating is not very accurate after 34 weeks of gestation and has standard deviation of about 2 weeks. The aim of the study was to verify whether fetal colon diameter can be used as a tool for estimating gestational age (GA) of fetuses between 32 to 40 weeks.

Methods: 100 healthy pregnant women aged 20-35 years were recruited. Fetal bi-parietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femoral lengths were assessed by ultrasound. In addition descending colon diameter was assessed at the level of colonic haustra. The correlation between GA and colon thickness was assessed by the Pearson correlation test.

Results: Significant correlation between fetal colon diameter and maternal gestational age was observed (r=0.582). Correlation between gestational age and femur length (r = 0.725) was found to be higher than that between gestational age and colon diameter (r = 0.528) suggesting that femur length is a better parameter than colon diameter for gestational age estimation. The regression equation for gestational age as a function of colon diameter was derived as GA = 28.614 + 0.629 × CD. The diagnostic accuracy of CD of ≥ 12mm in predicting term pregnancy was 75% with a high negative predictive value of 88.9% and positive predictive value of 58.7%.

Conclusions: The present study suggested that colon diameter can be used for predicting term pregnancy. Further studies are required to validate this novel marker of maturity amongst Indian population.


Keywords


Colon thickness, Fetal colon, Gestational age, Ultrasound

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lohr PA, Reeves MF, Creinin MD. A comparison of Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography for determination of gestational age and clinical outcomes in women undergoing early medical abortion. Contraception. 2010;81(3):240-4.

Gottlieb AG, Galan HL. Nontraditional sonographic pearls in estimating gestational age. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(3):154-60.

Goldstein I, Lockwood C, Hobbins JC. Ultrasound assessment of fetal intestinal development in the evaluation of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(5):682-6.

Nyberg DA, Abuhamad A, Ville Y. Ultrasound assessment of abnormal fetal growth. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28(1):3-22.

de Carvalho AA, Marchiori E, Carvalho JA, Figueiredo I, Velarde LG. Use of fetal colon thickness for auxillary term dating of pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;112(3):216-9.

Loret de Mola JR, Judge N, Entsminger C, Deviney M, Muise KL, Duchon MA. Indirect prediction of fetal lung maturity. Value of ultrasonographic colonic and placental grading. J Reprod Med. 1998;43(10):898-902.

Maulik D. Fetal growth compromise: definitions, standards and classification. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):214-8.

Kalish RB, Chervenak FA. Ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Optimal Obstetrics. 2002;1(2):1-6.

Mongelli M, Yuxin NG, Biswas A, Chew S. Accuracy of ultrasound dating formulae in the late second-trimester in pregnancies conceived with in-vitro fertilization. Acta Radiol. 2003;44(4):452-5.

Doubilet PM, Benson CB. Improved prediction of gestational age in the late third trimester. J Ultrasound Med. 1993;12(11):647-53.

Zilianti M, Fernández S. Correlation of ultrasonic images of fetal intestine with gestational age and fetal maturity. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62(5):569-73.

Zalel Y, Perlitz Y, Gamzu R, Peleg D, Ben-Ami M. In-utero development of the fetal colon and rectum: sonographic evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(2):161-4.

Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Patten RM, Cyr DR. Fetal bowel. Normal sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6(1):3-6.

Hertzberg BS. Sonography of the fetal gastrointestinal tract: anatomic variants, diagnostic pitfalls, and abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(5):1175-82.