DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20222305
Published: 2022-08-29

Women’s fear of normal delivery and their decision on the mode of delivery: a cross-sectional study

Anima Sarker, Shamima Haque Chowdhury, Mosammat Shahina Begum, Juthi Bhowmik, Mohammad Shaiful Islam

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section, C-section, or caesarean birth is the surgical delivery of a baby through a cut (incision) in the mother's abdomen and uterus. It's a surgical procedure utilized when a vaginal delivery isn't possible or safe, or when the health of the mother or infant is at risk. Caesarean section rates range from 0.4 to 40% in different countries, and the trend has been growing over the previous 30 years. These increases have been linked to a number of factors. The purpose of this study was to learn more about these factors in the context of Bangladeshi demographics. Aim of the study was to investigate the women’s Fear of normal delivery and their decision on the mode of delivery

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynecology in Uttara Adhunik medical college and hospital, Bangladesh. The study duration was from 1February 2021 to 30 November 2021. The present study was carried out with a total of 63 women who had undergone caesarean section during the study period. A convenient sample selection method was done for the selection of the participants

Result: Among the participants of the present study, 47.62% were aged between 25-29 years, 76.19% were Muslims, and 76.19% stayed at the hospital for 3-4 days. 90.48% had been pregnant for 36-40 weeks. Lower abdominal pain and labor pain was observed in 20.63% of the participants. The majority of the participants underwent caesarean delivery due to fear of labor pain and episiotomy.

Conclusion: The fear of childbirth or labor pain is the most common cause in patients undergoing caesarean section, followed by doctor advice due to medical comorbidities and fear of episiotomy.


Keywords


Pregnancy, Fear of normal delivery, Caesarean, Cause

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sewell JE. Cesarean section–a brief history. Available at: https://www.healthline.com/. Accessed on 20 October 2022.

Cesarean section. Available at: https://www.hopkins medicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/ cesarean-section. Accessed on 20 October 2022.

Wagner M. Choosing cesarean section. Lancet. 2000; 356(9242):1677-80.

Macfarlane A, Chamberlain G. What is happening to cesarean section rates?. Lancet. 1993;342(8878): 1005-6.

Thomas J, Paranjothy SR. Royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists clinical effectiveness support unit. national sentinel cesarean section audit report. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk. Accessed on 20 October 2022.

Guihard P, Blondel B. Trends in risk factors for cesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108(1):48-55.

Odlind V, Haglund B, Pakkanen M, Olausson PO. Deliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973-2000: trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(6):516-28.

Preliminary report, Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey 2011. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/. Accessed on 20 October 2022.

Dutta DC. Operative obstetrics. In: Kona H eds. Text book of obstetrics. 7th ed. New Central Book Agency; Kolkata: 2011;589-97.

Turner MJ, Brassil M, Gordon H. Active management of labor associated with a decrease in the cesarean section rate in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(2): 150-4.

Kawnine N, Guinness L, Amin MA, Anwar R, Killingsworth JR, Hedrick-Wong Y, Sabina N. Costs and outcomes of cesarean section procedures in public, private and NGO health care facilities in Bangladesh. Planning. 1998;8(11):33-42.

Badakhsh MH, Seifoddin M, Khodakarami N, Gholami R, Moghimi S. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 30-year period in a public hospital in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iranian Med. 2012;15(1):1-9.

Mukherjee SN. Rising cesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(4):298-300.

Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(1):47-52.

Shearer EL. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Social Sci Med. 1993;37(10):1223-31.

Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sørlie T, Øian P. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth. 2006;33(3):221-8.

Handelzalts JE, Fisher S, Lurie S, Shalev A, Golan A, Sadan O. Personality, fear of childbirth and cesarean delivery on demand. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(1):16-21.

Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, Pozzo GD, Heymann WC, Ronfani L, Barbone F. Determinants of length of stay after cesarean sections in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (north-eastern Italy), 2005-2015. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-26.

Saisto T, Halmesmäki E. Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(3): 201-8.

Takegata M, Haruna M, Morikawa M, Yonezawa K, Komada M, Severinsson E. Qualitative exploration of fear of childbirth and preferences for mode of birth among Japanese primiparas. Nurs Health Sci. 2018; 20(3):338-45.

Akintayo AA, Ade-Ojo IP, Olagbuji BN, Akin-Akintayo OO, OgundareOR, Olofinbiyi BA. Cesarean section on maternal request: the viewpoint of expectant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289(4):781-5.