DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161657

Agonist versus antagonist protocol in induction of ovulation and its outcome

Prasad Lele, Raju Agarwal, Chuni Selden

Abstract


Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist produces immediate suppression of gonadotrophins secretion without the initial stimulatory effect of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) .The aim of the study was to compare the agonist and the antagonist protocol in the induction of ovulation.

Methods: The study is a comparative study conducted from 01 November 2011 to 31 August 2013. All patients of primary or secondary infertility underwent a baseline transvaginal sonography on day 2 or day 3rd of the menstrual cycle for follicle count and endometrial thickness.  All patients received oral contraceptive pills from day 5 for 21 days of menstrual cycle and were assigned to two categories; the agonist and the antagonist group.

Results: A total of 380 patients, 190 patients of agonist group 52 had a positive β hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) report (27.3%) compared to the 60 patients of 190 antagonist group (31.5%). The P value was 0.44 which is statistically insignificant. Age group were similar and mean age of agonist group was27.96+3.21 where as in antagonist group 28.11+3.24. The number of oocyte retrieved was found to be better in the antagonist group compared to agonist group (mean±sd 10.71+6.41 versus 8.62±5.65, P value<0.001). The patients in the agonist group had a slightly more number of transfers performed (2.78±0.94), in comparison to the antagonist group (2.75±0.97). P-value was 0.789 which was statistically insignificant.

Conclusions: The GnRH antagonist therefore seems to be a more patient friendly protocol for the first choice in ART cycle with lower incidence of side effects and similar pregnancy rate. It is also time saving and simple protocol with good clinical outcome.


Keywords


GnRH antagonist, Agonist, LH, FSH, hCG, Endometrium thickness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ascheim S, Zondek B. Hypophysenvorderlaooen hormone und ovarial hormone imHarn von Schargeren. KlinischeWochenschrift. 1927;6:13-21.

Fevold SL, Hisaw FL, Leonard SL. The gonad-stimulating and the luteinizing hormone of the anterior lobe of the hypophysis. American Journal of Physiology. 1931;97:291-301.

Hamblen EC. Endocrine therapy of functional ovarian failure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1940;40:615-62.

Gemzell CA. Induction of ovulation with pituitary gonadotrophins. Fertility and Sterility. 1962;13:153-68.

Hayden CJ, Balen AH, Rutherford AJ. Recombinant gonadotrophins. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1999;106:188-96.

Conn PM, Crowley WF Jr. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its analogs. Annual Review of Medicine. 1994;45:391-405.

Gorgeon A, Lefevre B. Evaluation of the largest healthy and atretic follicle during the human menstrual cycle. J Reprod Fertil. 1983;69:497-502.

Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Hansmann M. Pregnancies following chronic intermittent (pulsatile) administration of Gn-RH by means of a portable pump (‘Zyklomat’) – a new approach to the treatment of infertility in hypothalamic amenorrhea. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1980;51:1214-6.

Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Effect of oral contraceptive pill pretreatment on ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH for IVF. A randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:352-7.

Al-Inany H and Aboulghar M. GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:874-85.

Al-Inany HG, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD001750.

Natalia PM, Vlahos NP, Jurema MW, Bracero NJ, Wallach EE, Garcia JE Clinical outcome of using ganirelix acetate versus a 4-day follicular phase leuprolide acetate protocol in unselected women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertility and sterility. 2003;80(1):103-10.

Fluker M, Grifo J, Leader A, Levy M, Meldrum D, Muasher SJ, Rinehart J. Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(1):38-45.

Olivennes F, Belaisch-Allart J, Emperaire JC, Dechaud H, Alvarez S, Moreau L, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with a single dose of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist (cetrorelix) or a depot formula of an LH-RH agonist (triptorelin). Fertil Steril. 2000;73:314-20.

Tehraninejad E, Nezamabadi AG, Rashidi B, Sohrabi M, Bagheri M, Haghollahi F, et al. GnRH antagonist versus agonist in normoresponders undergoing ICSI: a randomized clinical trial in Iran. Iran J Reprod Med. 2011;9(3):171-6.

Murber A, Fancsovits P, Ledó N, Gilán ZT, Rigó JJr, Urbancsek J. Impact of GnRH analogues on oocyte/embryo quality and embryo development in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a case control study.2009;7:103.

Chang MC. Fertilization and normal development of follicular oocytes in the rabbit. Science. 1955;121:867.

Minaretzis D, Harris D, Alper MM, Mortola JF, Berger MJ, Power D. Multivariate Analysis of Factors Predictive of Successful Live Births in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Suggests Strategies to Improve IVF Outcome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 1998;15(6):365-71.

Ludwig M, Felberbaum RE, Devroey P, Albano C, Riethmüller-Winzen H, Schüler A, et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. Significant reduction of the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by using the LHRH antagonist Cetrorelix (Cetrotide) in controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction. 2000;264(1):29-32.

Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, Abou-Setta AM. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD001750.