Comparison between static and dynamic cervical assessment in prediction of preterm birth


  • Ahmed E. Habashy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, ARE, Egypt
  • Tarek Tappozada Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, ARE, Egypt
  • Samir M. E. Sayed Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, ARE, Egypt



Cervical assessment, Preterm birth, Transvaginal ultrasound


Background: Preterm labor represents one of the most likely causes for prenatal hospitalization. Previously, the accuracy of cervical length measurement in predicting preterm birth was thoroughly examined. The current study aimed to compare static and dynamic cervical assessment in prediction and management of preterm labor.

Methods: The present study was prospective comparative study and conducted on (75) pregnant female patients recruited from the antenatal clinic of El-Shatby Maternity University hospital in the period from October 2021 till August 2022. The patients included in the study were divided into three groups; the first group included (25) patients and all were subjected to static cervical assessment, the second group included (25) patients and all were subjected to dynamic cervical assessment and the last group included (25) patients and all were subjected to interval dynamic cervical assessment. All groups are almost matched in their general characteristics. All groups received tocolysis in the form of nifedipine slow-release tablets 20 mg twice daily. Conventional static and dynamic transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length (CL) was done.

Results: There were inverse relationships between gestational age (GA), fundal level (FL) and mean gestational age (MGA) with the latency period but there was a direct relationship between the parity and the static cervical length in all the studied groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding their means of latency period in those with static cervical length >1.5-2.5 cm (most of cases in all groups). Although there was statistically significant difference between group A, B and C as regard their means of static and dynamic cervical length.

Conclusions: The longer the latency period, the lengthier the cervical length. The latency period had an inverse correlation with gestational age. There was also a direct relationship among parity and cervical length. The cervical estimation using the fundal pressure method, dynamic cervical length, is more enlightening than the interval approach.

Author Biography

Samir M. E. Sayed, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandria University, ARE, Egypt

Associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology, Alexandria university, ARE


Amelie K, Cardoso GP, Thill C, Verspyck E. and Marre S. Outcome at Two Years of Very Preterm Infants Born after Rupture of Membranes before Viability. PLoS One. 2016;11-5.

Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Getahun D. Primiparity: an 'intermediate' risk group for spontaneous and medically indicated preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(8):605-11.

Berger R, Rath W, Abele H, Garnier Y, Kuon RJ, Maul H. Reducing the Risk of Preterm Birth by Ambulatory Risk Factor Management. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2019;116(50):858.

Chehade H, Simeoni U, Guignard J‐P, Boubred F. Preterm Birth: Long Term Cardiovascular and Renal Consequences. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2018;14:219-26.

Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, O’Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, Hassan SS, Erez O, Pacora P, Nicolaides KH. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):10-25.

Dahman HAB. Risk factors associated with preterm birth: a retrospective study in Mukalla Maternity and Childhood Hospital, Hadhramout Coast/Yemen. Sudan J Paediatr. 2020;20(2):99-110.

El Sokkary FM, Nassef AH, Zidan MM. Prediction of latency interval of labour in preterm premature rupture of membranes by 2D ultrasound: Case control study. Evidence Based Women’s Health J. 2020;10(1):79-88.

Fortner KB, Grotegut CA, Ransom CE, Bentley RC, Feng L, Lan L, Heine RP, Seed PC, Murtha AP. Bacteria localization and chorion thinning among preterm premature rupture of membranes. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e83338.

Gire, C, Faggianelli, P and Nicaise C. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Cervical Length in Pregnancies Complicated by Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2002;19:565-9.

Ho N, Liu C, Nguyen A, Lehner C, Amoako A, Sekar R. Prediction of time of delivery using cervical length measurement in women with threatened preterm labor. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med. 2019;1:1-6.

Iams JD. Cervical length – time to report the rate of change? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:443.

Japan association of obstetricians and gynecologists: a report about uterine fundal pressure maneuver. Kristeller's maneuver. 2014.

Jenkins SM, Kurtzman JT, Osann K. Dynamic cervical change: is real-time sonographic cervical shortening predictive of preterm delivery in patients with symptoms of preterm labor? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;4:373-6.

Jha, A, Li X, Zhang S. and Li H. Successful Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane in Second Trimester: A Case Report and Literature Review. Yangtze Medicine. 2019;3:149-56.

Kathir V, Maurya, D and Keepanasseril A. Transvaginal Sonographic Assessment of Cervix in Prediction of Admission to Delivery Interval in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med. 2017;20:1-4.

Mehra S, Amon E, Hopkins S. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membranes? Am J Obst Gynecol. 2015;212(3):400.

Melamed N, Hiersch L, Meizner I, Bardin R, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. Is measurement of cervical length an accurate predictive tool in women with a history of preterm delivery who present with threatened preterm labor? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:661-8.

Melamed N, Pittini A, Hiersch L, Yogev Y, Korzeniewski SJ, Romero R, Barrett J. Do serial measurements of cervical length improve the prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with twin gestations? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):616.

Mombo-Ngoma G, Mackanga JR, González R. Young adolescent girls are at high risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: An observational multicountry study. BMJ Open. 2016;6-8.

Moroz LA, Brock CO, Govindappagari S, Johnson DL, Leopold BH, Gyamfi‐Bannerman C. Association between change in cervical length and spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:159.

Nooshin E, Mahdiss M, Maryam R, Amineh SN, Somayyeh NT. Prediction of Preterm Delivery by Ultrasound Measurement of Cervical Length and Funneling Changes of the Cervix in Pregnant Women with Preterm Labor at 28-34 weeks of Gestation. J Med Life. 2020;13(4):536-42.

Ouattara A, Ouedraogo CM, Ouedraogo A, Lankoande J. Factors associated with preterm birth in an urban African environment: A case-control study at the University Teaching Hospital of Ouagadougou and Saint Camille Medical Center. Med Sante Trop. 2015;25:296-9.

Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain GA. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. 2001;286:1340-8.

Phupong V, Kulmala L. Factors associated with latency period in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(16):2650-3.

Platt MJ. Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health. 2014;128:399-403.

Purisch SE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, editors. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017.

Rennert KN, Breuking SH, Schuit E. Change in cervical length after arrested preterm labor and risk of preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(5):750-6.

Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E. The Value of Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Examination of the Uterine Cervix in Predicting Preterm Delivery in Patients with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 1998;11:23-9.

Rottenstreich A, Gochman N, Kleinstern G. Is real-time dynamic cervical shortening predictive of preterm birth? - A case control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(24):4687-94.

Savitz DA, Ananth CV, Luther ER. Influence of gestational age on the time from spontaneous rupture of the chorioamniotic membranes to the onset of labor. Am J Perinatol. 1997;14:129-33.

Song JE, Lee KY, Kim MY, Jun HA. Cervical funneling after cerclage in cervical incompetence as a predictor of pregnancy outcome. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med. 2012;25(2):147-50.

Wildschut HI, Nas T, Golding J. Are sociodemographic factors predictive of preterm birth? A reappraisal of the 1958 British Perinatal Mortality Survey. BJOG. 1997;104:57-63.

World Health Organization. Preterm birth. 2022;23-9. Available at: Accessed on 12 May 2022.






Original Research Articles