Prenatal diagnosis of binders phenotype: a cross road to decision making

Authors

  • Kopperla Manasa Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Allam Sree Sraddha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • B. Susmitha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20223509

Keywords:

Binders phenotype, Binders syndrome, Intermaxillary hypoplasia, Congenital condition

Abstract

Binder’s syndrome is an uncommon congenital condition which develops in the first trimester of pregnancy and has characteristic effects on the facial features. Those effects are: arhinoid face, intermaxillary hypoplasia (associated with malocclusion), abnormal position of the nasal bones, nasal mucosa atrophy, anterior nasal spine agenesis and (in most cases) a lack of frontal sinuses. Other deformities, as well as mental retardation, are also possible. Due to the rarity of the disease, there are no treatment trials for these patients. Treatments reported in the medical literature are part of single case reports or small case series of patients. Here is a case report of a 23-year-old who presented to OPD at 26 weeks with features of binders’ phenotype. This woman delivered an infant of 2.7 kg without other abnormalities and no respiratory distress postnatally. Sonographic evaluation during pregnancy depicts proper differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategy. Multidisciplinary approach is mandatory in order to establish meticulous treatment. Further studies must be conducted, achieving this ultimate scope. Even so, the parents should be counselled that Binder syndrome is a tentative diagnosis prenatally, and that not all genetic syndromes can be prenatally excluded.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gupta A, Aneja A, Bahl N, Arora R, Sehgal RR, Saini P. Prenatal Binder Phenotype: Physician’s Dilemma-A Case Report. J Fetal Med. 2021;8:65–70.

Jain U, Thakur G, Kallury A. Binder's syndrome. BMJ Case Reports. 2011;2011:bcr0820114665.

Levaillant JM, Moeglin D, Zouiten K, Bucourt M, Burglen L, Soupre V, et al. Binder phenotype: clinical and etiological heterogeneity of the so-called Binder maxillonasal dysplasia in prenatally diagnosed cases, and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(2):140-50.

Sotiriadis A, Chatzistamatiou K, Dinas K, EFSUMB. A case of prenatally diagnosed binders syndrome. Available at: https://efsumb.org/a-case-of-prenatally-diagnosed-binder-syndrome-apr-2017/. Accessed on 24th September 2022.

Cook K, Prefumo F, Presti F, Homfray T, Campbell S. The prenatal diagnosis of Binder syndrome before 24 weeks of gestation: case report. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):578-81.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

How to Cite

Manasa, K., Sraddha, A. S., & Susmitha, B. (2022). Prenatal diagnosis of binders phenotype: a cross road to decision making. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(1), 268–270. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20223509

Issue

Section

Case Reports