Indications and complications of first caesarean section in Tanta University Hospital Versus Sidi Salem Central Hospital a comparative prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20223474Keywords:
CS, Indication, Complications, Post-operative shivering, Intra operative hemorrhageAbstract
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure in which obstetricians do incisions through the mother's abdomen and uterus to deliver one or more viable babies. The present study was undertaken to determine the indications and complication of first CS.
Methods: This prospective comparative study was done in Tanta university hospital and Sidi Salem central hospital, Egypt for one year in the gynecology and obstetrics department. It involved all females delivered by primary CS in the period from November 2020 to November 2021. Data was collected from the admission sheets of the patients and hospital record system.
Results: The total number of cases delivered by primary CS was 317, 104 case that represented 14.91%, 11.72% from the total number of cases delivered by CS in Tanta and Sidi Salem hospitals respectively. The most common indication for primary CS in Tanta university hospital among studied group was preeclampsia and eclampsia 53 case (16.71%). While in Sidi Salem central hospital, the most common indication was Failure of labor progress 18 case (17.3%). In Tanta university hospital, the most common complication was post-operative shivering 14 case (19.71%). While in Sidi Salem central hospital, the most common complication was intra operative hemorrhage 17 case (28.33%).
Conclusions: The incidence of primary CS in both hospitals was high, so intensive care units, blood banks, incubators with artificial respiration machines and expertise staff must be available at central hospitals in an attempt to decrease the incidence and complications.
Metrics
References
Finger C. Caesarean section rates skyrocket in Brazil. Lancet. 2003;362(9384):628-30.
Elnakib S, Abdel-Tawab N, Orbay D, Hassanein N. Medical and non- medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital based retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:411.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2005.
Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 2015;112(29-30):489.
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Oster MJK, Driscoll AK, Rossen LM. Births: Provisional Data for 2017. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 4. National Center for Health Statistics. 2018. Available at: https://WWW.cdc. gov/nchs/data/vsrr/report004.pdf. Accessed on 2 Nov, 2022.
Fisher ES, Welch HG. Avoiding the unintended consequences of growth in medical care: How might more be worse? JAMA. 1999;281(5):446-53.
Kohorst F, Flock, Kreienberg R, Reich A. Pregnancy and delivery after tension free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure: literature review and case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol. 2010;151(1):10-13.
Tan HJ, Siu W, Faeber GJ, McGuire EJ, Latini JM. Long-term durability of pubovaginal fascial slings in women who then become pregnant and deliver. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(6):631-5.
Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1501-5.
Giani U, Bruzzese D, Pugliese A, Saportio M, Triassi M. Risk factors analysis for elective caesarean section in Campania region (Italy) Epidemiol Prev. 2011;35(2):101-11.
Kmietowicz Z. NICE advices against caesarean section on demand. BMJ. 2004;328(7447):1031.
Sultan AH, Stanton SL. Preserving the pelvic floor and premium during childbirth-elective caesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;103(8):731-4.
Kottmel A, Hoesli I, Traub R. Maternal request: a reason for rising rates of cesarean section? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(1):93-8.
Shaaban MM, Ahmed WS, Khadr Z, El-Sayed HF. obstetricians' perspective towards cesarean section delivery based on professional level: experience from Egypt. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):317-23.
Pradhan A, Tincello DG, Kearney R. Childbirth after pelvic floor surgery: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics in England, 2002-2008. BJOG. 2013;120(2):200-4.
Demoulin G, Thubert T, Faivre E, Trichot C, Deffieux X. Grosssesse et postpartum des patientes porteuses de bandelette sous-uretrale: revue de la litterature (Pregnancy and postpartum of women with mid-urethral sling procedure: a review of the literature) J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013;42(6):518-24.
Helal AS, Abdel-Hady ES, Refaie E, Warda O, Goda H, Sherief LS. Rising rates of caesarean delivery at Mansoura University hospital: a reason for concern. Gynecol Obstet. 2013;3(146):2161-932.
Hindawi IM. The Jordanian Cesarean Section Rate. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(11):1632-5.
Abu Anza SH, Abu Omar AA. Frequency rate and indications of cesarean section at Prince Zaid bin Al Husein Hospital-Jordan. J Royal Med Serv. 2012;102(354):1-5.
Saraya YS, Alashkar AH, Ali MA. Indications and rate of first cesarean delivery in central region's maternity and children hospital. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(12):1251-5.
Abebe FE, Gebeyehu AW, Eyassu GA. Factors leading to cesarean section at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review. Reprod Health. 2016;13:6.
Kakoma JB. Cesarean section indications and anthropometric parameters in Rwanda nullipara: preliminary results from a longitudinal survey. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:310.
Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L. Indications associated with increased cesarean section rate in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2006;92(2):181-5.
Nomura RMY, Alves EA, Zugaib M. Maternal complications associated with type of delivery in a university hospital. Revista de Saude Publica. 2004;38(1):9-15.
Labib NY, Mortada MM, Guirguis WW, Abd El- Aziz HM. Cesarean section deliveries in one healthnninsurance hospital in Alexandria. J Egypt Publ Heal Asso. 2007;82(3-4):299.
Bobrowski RA, Bottoms SF. Underappreciated risks of the elderly multipara. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1995;172(6):1764-70.