A study of feto-maternal outcome in case of premature rupture of membrane at a tertiary care center

Authors

  • Sushma R. Shah Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Aastha H. Patel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Haresh U. Doshi GCS Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Gaurang Sindhav Department of Zoology and Biomedical Technology, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • R. Verma Department of Zoology and Biomedical Technology, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Ami V. Mehta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Bina M. Raval Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Riya B. Vaghela Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Amit R. Jadhav Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVPIMSR, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20230131

Keywords:

Premature rupture of membrane, Preterm premature rupture of membrane, Chorioamnionitis, Pre-term

Abstract

Background: Premature rupture of membranes is the rupture of the fetal membranes in the absence of uterine contraction or before the onset of labor. When this occurs before 37 weeks of gestation, it is termed as preterm premature rupture of membranes. Management depends upon gestational age and the presence of complicating factors. An accurate assessment of gestational age and knowledge of the maternal, fetal and neonatal risks are essential to appropriate evaluation, counselling, and care of patients with PROM. The purpose of the study is timely diagnosis and appropriate management of the cases of PROM and PPROM to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: A Prospective study was performed at the department of obstetrics and gynecology, at a tertiary care center from August 2020 to December 2021. A clinical data sheet was made for recording all information about the pregnant women after taking their consent. And their maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded.

Results: a total of 150 cases of PROM and PPROM were taken during our study out of which 53.33% belong to the younger age group, 43.33% were primi gravida, 66.66% belonged to the lower socioeconomic class, 25.33% had a previous history of abortion followed by dilatation and evacuation, rate of cesarean delivery was 34.66% and rate of NICU admission of neonates was 15.78% and 57.87% babies had low birth weight and rate of stillbirth was 1.97%. whereas 34.66% of cases had various complications related to PROM.

Conclusions: Individualized management of PROM cases depending on the gestational age and risk of complications and antibiotic coverage is the best way to achieve a good fetomaternal outcome.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Krishna UR, Shah MH. Prelabour rupture of membranes, obstetrics and gynecology for postgraduates. Ratnam SS, Rao KB, Arulkumaran S, eds. 2nd ed. India: Nirali Publishers; 1999:1;96-108.

Median TM, Hill DA. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(4):659-64.

Arias F, Daftary SN, Bhide AG. Premature rupture of membrane, practical guide to high-risk pregnancy and delivery, a South Asian Perspective. 3rd ed. USA: Wiley; 2008:240-61.

Alfirevic Z, Milna SJ, Livio S, cesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singoltons. Cochrane Databse Syst Rev. 2013;9:CD000078.

Misra R. Ian Donald’s Practical Obstetric Problems. 8th ed. India: Wolters Kluwer Pvt. Ltd.; 2020:470.

Manuaba IAC. Patology Obstetrics Textbook. Jakarta: EGC; 2008.

Hoyme B. Bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. An association with prematurity and postpartum complications. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1984;86: 213-22.

Gravett MG, Hummel D, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK. Preterm labor associated with subclinical. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(5):1422-6.

Gravett MG, Nelson HP, DeRouen T, Critchlow CC, et al. Independent association of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection with adverse pregnancy outcome. JAMA. 1986;256:1899-903.

Martius J, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Stamm WE. Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71: 89-95.

McGregor JA, French JI, Richter R. Antenatal microbiologic and maternal risk factors associated with prematurity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:1465-73.

Choudhary M, Rathore SB, Chowdhary J, Garg S. Pre and post conception risk factors in PROM. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(10).

Zhu L. Maternal and live-birth outcomes of pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):35141.

Arias F, Tomich PH. Etiology and outcome of low birth weight and preterm infants. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60:277-81.

Kaye D. Risk factors for preterm premature rupture of membranes at Mulago Kampala Uganda. East Afr Med J. 2001;78(2):65-9.

Daiva V, Stafan B, Vidaa M. Antenatal risk factors associated with PPROM. Acta Medica Litutania. 2002; 9(3):26.

Edem E, Carol A, Robert W, Atef M. Risks for premature rupture of amniotic membranes. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(3):39.

Zhou Q, Zhang W, Xu H, Liang H, Ruan Y, Zhou S, et al. Risk factors for preterm premature rupture of membranes in Chinese women from urban cities. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;127:3-5.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-25

How to Cite

Shah, S. R., Patel, A. H., Doshi, H. U., Sindhav, G., Verma, R., Mehta, A. V., Raval, B. M., Vaghela, R. B., & Jadhav, A. R. (2023). A study of feto-maternal outcome in case of premature rupture of membrane at a tertiary care center. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(2), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20230131

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles