Maternal and perinatal outcome in instrumental vaginal deliveries over 5 years: a retrospective study

Authors

  • Fatima M. Ghanchi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GCS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Misbah I. Mansuri Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GCS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Haresh U. Doshi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GCS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Prarthana H. Kharod Patel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GCS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20230790

Keywords:

Instrumental vaginal delivery, Forceps, Maternal complication, Vacuum, Perinatal outcome

Abstract

Background: Due to fear of trauma and less skill, use of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) is decreasing every year and incidence of caesarean section is increasing. Caesarean section is a major surgery associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery and associated maternal and perinatal outcome.

Methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out in full term antenatal patients in labour with vertex presentation who had undergone operative vaginal deliveries during the study period from January 2017 to December 2021 at G.C.S. Hospital. Data were obtained from the hospital records and analysed which included the age, parity, incidence, indication, the APGAR scores of the babies and complications in the patient.

Results: Incidence of instrumental deliveries was found to be 1.98%. Most common indications for IVD were prolonged second stage of labour followed by foetal distress and post-dated pregnancy. Most common maternal complication was perineal tears and most common perinatal complication was neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

Conclusions: The decision to proceed with an operative vaginal delivery when a spontaneous vaginal delivery is not possible must be based upon maternal and foetal factors. Most common maternal complications were perineal tears, cervical tears, episiotomy extension, vaginal laceration and atonic postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). Most common neonatal complications were NICU admission most commonly for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

 

References

Otolorin E, Gomez P, Currie S, Thapa K, Dao B. Essential basic and emergency obstetric and newborn care: from education and training to service delivery and quality of care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(2):S46-53.

Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC. Operative vaginal delivery, neonatal, infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329-34.

Johanson R. Advances in assisted vaginal delivery with vacuum extractor.In Bonnar J (Ed).Recent Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone. 1998;125:139.

Ameh CA, Weeks AD. The Role of Instrumental Vaginal delivery in low resource settings. BJOG. 2009;116(1):22-5.

Aliyu LD, Kadas AS, Hauwa MA. Instrumental vaginal delivery in bauchi, northeast Nigeria. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2011;1(4):18-27.

Bailey PE. The disappearing art of instrumental delivery. Int J of Gyn and Obs. 2005;91:89-96.

Prapas N, Kalogiannidis I, Masoura S. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: short term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009;13:41-5.

Singh A, Rathore P. A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;61(6):663-6.

Angoli R, Gomez MO, Centuaria G, Sullivan OMJ. Severe Perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery; The University of Miami Experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;182:1083-5.

Bradley MS, Kaminski RJ, Streitman DC, Dunn SL, Krans EE. Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):132-7.

Handa VL, Danielsen BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstetr Gynecol. 2001;98:225-30.

Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bautram CL, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during Instrumental delivery. Int Obstet Gynecol. 1993;43:263-70.

Patel RR, Murphy DJ. Clinical review Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice. BMJ. 2004;328:1302.

Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000224.

Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Cohort study of the early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in the second stage of labour. Lancet. 2001;358:1203-7.

Shameel F, Bava A, Nandanwar YS. Instrumental vaginal deliveries at tertiary centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:4146-50.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles