Comparison of DIPSI and IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus- a prospective study in a sub-urban multi-speciality hospital

Authors

  • Yogini Patil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Mira Road (East), Thane-401 107 Maharashtra, India
  • Kamalpriya Thiyagarajan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Mira Road (East), Thane-401 107 Maharashtra, India
  • Vaishali Chaudhari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Mira Road (East), Thane-401 107 Maharashtra, India
  • Kshama Shah Department of Anesthesia, Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Mira Road (East), Thane-401 107 Maharashtra, India
  • Ria Vijay Department of Medical Research, Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Mira Road (East), Thane-401 107 Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20230532

Keywords:

Diagnosis, DIPSI, GDM, IADPSG, Pregnancy

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) refers to any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or when it is first diagnosed during pregnancy. Gestational diabetes mellitus is found to adversely affect the maternal and perinatal outcomes. The extent of the risks associated with GDM and the prevalence rate of GDM depends on the diagnostic criteria used and ethnicity of the pregnant women. Hence in order to prevent the morbidities that could result due to GDM, it is crucial to diagnose and treat during the early stages. However, confusion pertaining to the detection and diagnosis of GDM still prevails due to applicability of various threshold guidelines for its diagnosis.

Methods: The study was a prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled study conducted in the year 2021 at the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Thane, India. The objective of the study was to evaluate the utility of IADPSG and DIPSI guidelines for screening and diagnosis of GDM at a tertiary care center.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of DIPSI and IADPSG were compared and their readings were evaluated. The results proved that DIPSI criteria was more sensitive as compared to IADPSG criteria.

Conclusions: DIPSI is a non-fasting, fairly simple, single test method that is appropriate for low resource countries. The sensitivity of IADPSG criteria was shown to be slightly lower when compared with DIPSI criteria in the current study, despite the fact that they are universal criteria for screening and diagnosing GDM around the world. The only limitation was that it was a single center study.

References

Metzger BE, Cho NH, Roston SM, Radvany R. Prepregnancy weight and antepartum insulin secretion predict glucose tolerance five years after gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(12):1598-605.

Federation ID. IDF diabetes atlas. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation. 2013;128:40-50.

Madsen JK, Haunsøe S, Helquist S, Hommel E, Malthe I, Pedersen NT, et al. Prevalence of hyperglycaemia and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Acta Med Scand. 1986;220(4):329-32.

Zargar AH, Sheikh MI, Bashir MI, Masoodi SR, Laway BA, Wani AI, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Kashmiri women from the Indian subcontinent. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;66(2):139-45.

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes care. 2010;33(3):676-82.

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes- 2011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):S15.

Mohan V, Mahalakshmi MM, Bhavadharini B, Maheshwari K, Kaliyarasi G, Anjana RM, et al. Comparison of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus by oral glucose tolerance tests done in the non-fasting (random) and fasting states. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:1007-13.

Seshiah V, Das AK, Balaji V, Joshi SR, Parikh M, Gupta S. Gestational diabetes mellitus-guidelines. JAPI. 2006;54(622).

Metzger BE, Contreras M, Sacks DA, Watson W, Dooley SL, Foderaro M, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991-2002.

Geetha N, Sangeetha KG. Comparison of IADPSG and DIPSI criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016;15:1-4.

Vij P, Jha S, Gupta SK, Aneja A, Mathur R, Waghdhare S, Panda M. Comparison of DIPSI and IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM: a study in a north Indian tertiary care center. Int J Diabetes Develop Countries. 2015;35(3):285-8.

Srinivasan S, Reddi RP. Comparative study of DIPSI and IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):933.

Bhavadharini B, Uma R, Saravanan P, Mohan V. Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus- relevance to low and middle income countries. Clin Diabetes Endocrino. 2016;2(1):1-8.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles