Analyzing indications for caesarean delivery in a tertiary care facility in India by Robsons Ten Group Classification System: journey to reduce maternal mortality-audit caesarean rates: a prospective observational design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231216Keywords:
Caesarean section, Maternal morbidity in caesarean, Rising caesarean rates, Robson’s ten group classificationAbstract
Background: Rising caesarean rates pose a challenge to obstetricians, the healthcare system, and the national economy. High rate of caesarean without clear evidence of a decrease in maternal and neonatal morbidity is matter of concern. The era of impatient obstetricians, and caesareans on demand are major contributing factors. The purpose of this study is to validateTGCS classification for indications of caesarean. This would help to audit and streamline the indications of caesarean. Standardization of indications is the need of the hour. Learning from what has happened in background of local situations is the main aim of this work.
Methods: In a prospective observational design, 1140 women who underwent caesarean for varied indications in C R Gardi Hospital Ujjain were recruited. Patients were classified according to Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Every woman was observed for post-cesarean morbidities like wound dehiscence, anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, and puerperal sepsis. Neonates were observed for NICU admission, low birth weight, prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, and death. Chi- Square and student t test were used for analysis.
Results: 45.8% of women were of group 5. Modifiable indications were 60.2% in the primary caesarean of group 5. PPH, puerperal sepsis, PNC anemia, wound dehiscence, DVT, rupture uterus and NICU admission, respiratory distress syndrome of neonates were significantly high in group 5 ( p= less than 0.05).
Conclusions: Out of all caesarean 45.8% are second caesarean for previous one caesarean. PPH, puerperal sepsis, wound dehiscence and PNC anemia are significantly high in group 5.
Metrics
References
Editorial. Stemming the global caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1279.
Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, et al. Caesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol.2012;29:7-18.
WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organisation. 2015.
Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2008;199:36e1–5
Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat caesarean deliveries. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. ObstetGynecol.2006;107:1226–32.
The Robson classification implementation manual, 2015 available at http://www.who.int/ reproductivehealth/topics/maternal_perinatal/robsonclassification-implementation/en/
Mahadik, Kalpana. “Rising Caesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused.” Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India vol. 69,6 (2019): 483-489.
Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The ten-group Robson classifcation: a single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. ObstGynecolInt.2017;56:489-93.
Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, et al. Classifcations for Caesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS ONE.2011;6(1):14566.
Chhabra S, Arora G. Delivery in women with previous caesarean section. J ObstetGynecol India. 2006 Jul 1;56(4):304-7.
MahaleArunRamakrishnan Rao, Ghodkeujwalapopat, BhingarePrashanthEknath, Sahare Anil Pandit Rao. Intra Operative difficulties in Repeat Caesarean Section- A Study of 287 cases. J ObstetGynecol India. 2008;58:507-510.
Mafatlal, Shah Jitesh and Mehta MeghanaNarendrabhai. Analysis of mode of delivery in women with previous one caesarean section. 2009;9:98.
Bhargawa M, Ishrat Jahan. Prospective study on outcome of labour in previous one caesarean section. 2010 May.
Chiniwar MA, Menasinkai SB. Maternal and neonatal outcome in patients with vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). The New Indian Journal of OBGYN. 2019; 5(2): 99-102.
Kazmi T, Saiseema S 5th, Khan S. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification. Oman Med J.2012;27(5):415-7.
Abubeker FA, Gashawbeza B, Gebre TM, Wondafrash M, Teklu AM, Degu D, Bekele D. Analysis of caesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;9;20(1):767.
Zimmo MW, Laaine K, Hassan S, et al. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classifcation System: a population-based birth cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;1:2.
Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, et al. Use of Robson classifcation to assess caesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;13(3):128.
Madan, Shikha&Sangwan, Neetu& Nanda, Smiti&Sirohiwal, Daya&Dahiya, Pushpa&Singhal, Savita & Arora, Tarun. (2020). Impact of increase of caesarean section on postpartum hemorrhage in a tertiary care center of India over 6 years. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020;10:192.
Farine D, Shepherd D. Classifcation of Caesarean Sections in Canada: the modifed Robson Criteria. A CommOpinObstetGynaecol Can.2012;34(10):976–9.
Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, et al. A systematic review of the Robson classification for Caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS ONE.2014;9(6):e97769.
Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modifed Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J ReprodContraceptObstet Gynecol.2017;6:5038–43.
Katke RD, Zarariya AN, Desai PV. LSCS audit in a tertiary care center in Mumbai: to study indications and risk factors in LSCS and it’s effect on early peri-natal morbidity and mortality rate. Int J ReprodContraceptObstetGynecol2014;3:963-8.
Balachandran L, Vaswani PR, Mogotlane R. Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one caesarean section. J ClinDiagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):99-102.
Qu ZQ, Ma RM, Xiao H, Tian YQ, Li BL, Liang K, Du MY, Chen Z, Geng L, Yang MH, Tao YP, Zhu B. [The outcome of trial of labor after caesarean section]. Zhonghua Fu Chan KeZaZhi.2016;51(10):748-753.
Loebel G, Zelop CM, Egan JF, Wax J. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Caesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Caesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2004 Apr 1;15(4):243-6.
Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynecol.2009;113:1231-8.
Jinturkar AA, Dongaonkar D. Study of obstetric and fetal outcome of post caesarean section pregnancy at tertiary care center. International Journal of Recent Trends in Sci And Technology.2014;10(3):530-7.
Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, Fernandez E, Gundabattula SR, Betran AP, Khan K, Zamora J, Thangaratinam S. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet.2019;393(10184):1973-1982
Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and caesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica.2017;51:105.
Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Caesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571.
Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet.2015;392(10155):1286–7.
Mayne L, Liu C, Tanaka K, Amoako A. Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(1):61-6.
Sanisoglu S, Engin-Ustun Y, Karatas Baran G, Kurumoglu N, Keskinkilic B. Use of ten-group Robson classification in Turkey to discuss caesarean section trends. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2022;14:41-49