The effect of preventive measures to reduce the decision to delivery interval in women undergoing emergency caesarean section

Authors

  • Donthireddy L. Sahithi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Manju A. Talathi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Vaishali S. Taralekar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231528

Keywords:

Emergency cesarean section, Deviation percentage

Abstract

Background: Time interval between the decision to perform an emergency caesarean (ES) section and the actual delivery is known as decision delivery interval (DDI). A third phase delay in the delivery of emergency obstetric care is caused by prolonged DDI. In an effort to reduce maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity and mortality, it is essential to implement interventions designed to reduce DDI.

Methods: This study was carried out to reduce DDI by setting benchmarks for all categories according to Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guidelines 2010, in our setup. The study carried out in 2 phases; first phase was a pilot study comprising of 143 women who underwent ES section. The deviation in DDI with possible causes were noted. The benchmarks were set to 8%, 30% and 20% for categories 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Corrective actions were taken including both hospital and patient causes for delay and were discussed at each level. Second phase included total 460 women from January to December 2021 and evaluated for DDI.

Results: Out of 460, 87 (18.91%) women had deviated from the set DDI. The percentages in individual categories 1, 2 and 3 were 17.22%, 30.50%, and 29.50%, respectively. The deviation percentage of DDI in category 2, was achieved as per benchmark set in a pilot study, however, it was not achieved for other categories.

Conclusions: Since the result that was obtained didn’t reach the set deviation percentage, we have observed that achieved deviation cannot be further reduced as our clinical setup is a teaching institute.

References

Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2019. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/327596. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

World Health Organization. Maternal mortality. 2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

Hughes NJ, Namagembe I, Nakimuli A, Sekikubo M, Moffett A, Patient CJ et al. Decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):324.

Aiken CE, Aiken AR, Scott JG, Brockelsby JC. The influence of hours worked prior to delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):634-7.

Reif P, Pichler G, Griesbacher A, Lehner G, Schöll W, Lang U, et al. Do time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority affect neonatal outcome in deliveries at ≥34+0 weeks of gestation? BJOG. 2018;125(7):884-91.

Tolcher MC, Johnson RL, El-Nashar SA, West CP. Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):536-48.

Hirani BA, Mchome BL, Mazuguni NS, Mahande MJ. The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:411.

American Academy of Pediatrics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 5th edition. Elk Grove Village (IL). 2002. Available at: https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/-/media/3a22e153b67446 a6b31fb051e469187c.ashx. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Report of a joint working group: organization standards for maternity services. London (GB). 1995. Available at: https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/-/media/3a22e153b67446a6b31fb051e46918 7c.ashx. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

Schauberger CW, Chauhan SP. Emergency cesarean section and the 30-minute rule: definitions. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:221-6.

Singh R, Deo S, Pradeep Y. The decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections and its correlation with perinatal outcome: evidence from 204 deliveries in a developing country. Trop Dr. 2012;42(2):67-9.

Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:251-67.

Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? BJOG. 2002;109:505-8.

Livermore LJ, Cochrane RM. Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1,000 emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:307-10.

Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Gilbert S, Hauth JC, Landon MB, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:6-11.

Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ. 2001;322:1330-3.

Bello FA, Tsele TA, Oluwasola TO. Decision-to-delivery intervals and perinatal outcomes following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130:279-83.

Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:946-50.

Onah HE, Ibeziako N, Umezulike AC, Effetie ER, Ogbuokiri CM. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:342-6.

Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Caesarean section: NICE clinical guideline 132. London (GB). 2011. Available at: https://www. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

Standards of Obstetric-Gynaecologic Services. 7th edition. Washington, DC: ACOG. American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist. 1989;39.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. CG132 Cesarean Section. Clinical Guidelines for Emergency CS. Available at: http://www. guidance.nice.org.uk/CG132. Accessed on 29 March 2023.

Gupta S, Naithani U, Madhanmohan C, Singh A, Reddy P, Gupta A. Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017;33(1):64-70.

Degu Ayele A, Getnet Kassa B, Nibret Mihretie G, Yenealem Beyene F. Decision to Delivery Interval, Fetal Outcomes and Its Factors Among Emergency Caesarean Section Deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study, 2020. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:395-403.

Radhakrishnan G, Yadav G, Vaid NB, Ali H. Factors affecting “decision to delivery interval” in emergency cesarean sections in a tertiary care hospital: A cross sectional observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:651-6.

Hillemanns P, Hasbargen U, Strauss A, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Hepp H. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: Evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;268:136-41.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles