Role of imaging modalities in diagnosis of silent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy after ovulation induction: a case report

Authors

  • Prerna Priya Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Yashaswi Pandey Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Madhu Jain Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Lavanya Anuranjani Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vanita Mahaske Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Yashi Srivastava Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anita Thakur Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Gopika Ambat Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231578

Keywords:

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, Ovulation induction, Fertility preserving surgery

Abstract

There has been an increased prevalence of ectopic pregnancies in the present scenario attributing to 1.5-2% of all pregnancies. Caesarean scar pregnancies are rare, occurring in approximately 1 in 2000 pregnancies, although the incidence is increasing. The increasing rate of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies mirrors the increasing rate of caesarean delivery. Disruption of the endometrium and myometrium after caesarean delivery predisposes to improper implantation at the site of the prior hysterotomy. Without normal surrounding myometrium, untreated caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies can result in uterine rupture with severe maternal hemorrhage and death. Although ultrasound remains the primary imaging modality for this diagnosis, MRI may be useful in the setting of equivocal cases and also may aid in the detection of possible placental implantation or bladder wall invasion. An MRI may provide additional confirmation of the ultrasound findings and characterize the myometrial interface if the pregnancy is difficult to distinguish from other pregnancy complications such as a cervical ectopic pregnancy or consideration for expectant management of pregnancy is considered.

References

ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins Tubal ectopic pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin. Clin Manage Guidelines Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):e91-103.

Kaelin Agten A, Cali G, Monteagudo A, Oviedo J, Ramos J, Timor-Tritsch I. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(510):e1–e6.

Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Jonat W. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68(8):571-81.

El-sayed El-badawy A, El-agwany SA, El-habashy MA, Elmansy A. Lower uterine segment pregnancy (Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and early placenta accreta: a rising complication from cesarean section with possible and similar early ultrasound diagnoses and management. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2015;46(4):977-80.

Cömert EH, Şal H, Ekici YS, Seda E, Guven G. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a case report. Turkiye Klinikleri Jinekoloji Obstetrik. 2018;26(1):37-9.

Deutchman M, Tubay AT, Turok DK. First trimester bleeding. Am Fam Phys. 2009;79(11):985-92.

Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy not within the (distal) fallopian tube: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):289-99.

Fylstra DL, Pound-Chang T, Grant Miller M, Cooper A, Miller KM. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean delivery scar: a case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:302-4.

Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(2):398-400.

Hoover W, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:495-502.

Jurkovic D, Wilkinson H. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ. 2011;342(d3397):1353-7.

Marion LL, Meeks GR. Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):376-86.

Patel MA. Scar ectopic pregnancy. J Med Biol Eng. 2015;65(6):372-5.

Peng KW, Lei Z, Xiao TH, Jia FG, Zhong WX, Gao Y. First trimester caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy evaluation using MRI. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(2):123-9.

Rosen T. Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:519-29.

Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies etiology. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1373-81.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:225.e1–225.e7.

Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):592-3.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

Issue

Section

Case Reports