Screening of cancer cervix: Pap smear in rural India

Authors

  • Parimala A. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
  • Nidhi Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India
  • Jayashree K. Srinivasan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha University, Chennai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162020

Keywords:

Cervical cancer screening, Cytology, Rural community, Pap smear

Abstract

Background: The incidence of cervical premalignant lesions in rural India is likely to be high due to presence of several risk factors like early marriage, early coitarche and multiparity. Hence prospective cross sectional study was conducted to find the incidence of pre-invasive state and cancer of cervix in women between the age group 30 and      60 years, visiting Thirumazhisai health centre by Pap’s smear method.

Methods: Cervical mucosa is scraped, using Ayre spatula a 360° turn is made at the transition zone and smeared on a slide and papanicolaou stain is applied and the slide is examined under microscope. If Pap’s smear confirms low/high grade lesion, biospy is done to confirm the finding. The result is analysed for pre-invasive state.

Results: Out of the cases (107) examined with in the study period, 36.45% were normal. Out of the rest 47.05% had an inflammatory smear, 14.7% had active bacterial infection, 17.65% had active candida infection and 5.88% had high-grade intraepithelial lesion (CIN 3).

Conclusions: The incidence of high-grade lesion for cervical cancer is high among the rural population and they are susceptible to develop the cancer. Regular screening for cancer of uterine cervix is of need among people of lower socio economic status. Awareness should be created on cervical cancer and its complications.

References

Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. Lyon, France:IARC press;2004 (Version 1.0. IARC Cancer Base No. 5). GLOBOCAN;2002.

Papanicolau GN, Traut HF. Diagnosis of uterine cancer by the vaginal smear. The Anatomical Record. 1943;86(4):591-2.

Satyanarayana L, Asthana S, Bhambani S, Sodhani P, Gupta S. A comparative study of cervical cancer screening methods in a rural community setting of north India. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51:124-8.

Deodhar K, Sankaranarayanan R, Jayant K, Jeronimo J, Thorat R, Hingmire S, et al. Accuracy of concurrent visual and cytology screening in detecting cervical cancer precursors in rural India. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:954-62.

Li R, Zhou Q, Li M, Tong SM, He M, Qiu H, et al. Evaluation of visual inspection as the primary screening method in a four-year cervical (pre-) cancer screening program in rural China. Trop Doct. 2013;43:96-9.

Longatto FA, Naud P, Derchain SF, Roteli MC, Tatti S, Hammes LS, et al. Performance characteristics of Pap test, VIA, VILI, HR-HPV testing, cervicography, and colposcopy in diagnosis of significant cervical pathology. Virchows Arch. 2012;460:577-85.

Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R. Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A beginners′ manual. Lyon, France: IARC Press,WHO;2003.

Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, Muwonge R, Swaminathan R, Shanthakumari S, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: A cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:398-406.

Tamil Nadu Health Systems Project. Available from: http://www.tnhsp.org/screening-cervical-cancer-and-breast-cancer.Accessed on 28 February 2016.

Dasgupta S, Bhattacharya S. Is visual inspection with acetic acid better than cervical cytology to screen women ≥40 years of age for carcinoma cervix? A cross-sectional study on proportion of screen-positive women (by VIA and cervical cytology) having CIN II/III lesion on cervical biopsy: difference between two age groups and among screening methods. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:1731-6.

Krishnegowda S, Ms V. Efficacy of colposcopy technique with Pap smear and histology in screening of cervical lesions. Int Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(3):696-702.

Bhatla N, Gulati A, Mathur SR, Rani S, Anand K, Muwonge R, et al. Evaluation of cervical screening in rural North India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105:145-9.

New approaches to cervical cancer screening: developing aneffective programme for the world. Presented at the 10th European cancerconference, September 15, 1999. Available at www.medscape.com/ medscape/cno/1999.ECCO/ Story.cfm?story_id=783. Accessed on 8 March 2016.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles