The obstetrics and gynaecological distress measurement scale: a promising tool for improving obstetrics care

Authors

  • Aditi U. Kulkarni Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India
  • Tanvi D. Kothiwale Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India
  • Elisa T. Moras Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231913

Keywords:

Obstetrics, Gynaecology, Psychology, Distress, Stress, Mental Health, Physical health

Abstract

Background: Screening done on obstetrics patients is based on a few scales which are not targeted towards the population, thus a need for a targeted tool was necessary especially for the Indian population where these issues are high and care provided lacks in quality.

Methods: A top down survey was conducted followed by a brief interview. A pilot study was then done out of which specific items were selected.

Results: Cronbach's alpha yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.907. Split-half coefficient yielded a high level of internal consistency with a value of 0.867. The convergent validity was 0.62.

Conclusions: The OGDMS is a valuable tool for identifying potential psychological distress in women needing obstetrics care. OGDMS is a unified tool for doctors, psychologists, and patients to identify potential problem areas related to mental health.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

World Health Organization. WHO urges quality care for women and newborns in critical first weeks after childbirth, 2012. Available at https://www.who.int/news/item/30-03-2022-who-urges-quality-care-for-women-and-newborns-in-critical-first-weeks-after-childbirth Accessed 22 March 2023.

Upadhyay RP, Chowdhury R, Salehi A, Sarkar K, Singh SK, Sinha B, et al. Postpartum depression in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bullet Wor Heal Org. 2017;95(10):706.

Kimmel MC, Ferguson EH, Zerwas S, Bulik CM, Meltzer‐Brody S. Obstetric and gynecologic problems associated with eating disorders. Intern J Eating Dis. 2016;49(3):260-75.

Hall WA, Hauck YL, Carty EM, Hutton EK, Fenwick J, Stoll K. Childbirth fear, anxiety, fatigue, and sleep deprivation in pregnant women. J Obst Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 2009;38(5):567-76.

Patel V, Kirkwood BR, Pednekar S, Pereira B, Barros P, Fernandes J, et al. Gender disadvantage and reproductive health risk factors for common mental disorders in women: a community survey in India. Arch Gen Psych. 2006;63(4):404-13.

Afifi M. Gender differences in mental health. Singapore Med J. 2007;48(5):385.

Nielsen-Scott M, Fellmeth G, Opondo C, Alderdice F. Prevalence of perinatal anxiety in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders. 2022;306:71-9.

Shivalli S, Gururaj N. Postnatal depression among rural women in South India: do socio-demographic, obstetric and pregnancy outcomes have a role to play? PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0122079.

Udayar KK, Mallapur SE. An epidemiological study of postnatal depression among women availing maternal health services in rural areas of Belagavi, Karnataka, India. Intern J Comm Med Pub Heal. 2017;4(3):759.

Dubey C, Gupta N, Bhasin S, Muthal RA, Arora R. Prevalence and associated risk factors for postpartum depression in women attending a tertiary hospital, Delhi, India. Inter J Soc Psych. 2012;58(6):577-80.

Gentile S. Untreated depression during pregnancy: Short-and long-term effects in offspring. A systematic review. Neurosci. 2017;342:154-66.

Pop VJ, Pommer AM, Pop-Purceleanu M, Wijnen HA, Bergink V, Pouwer F. Development of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: the TPDS. BMC Preg Childb. 2011;11(1):1-8.

Ownby KK. Use of the distress thermometer in clinical practice. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019;10(2):175–9.

Levis B, Negeri Z, Sun Y, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2020;371.

Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psych. 2013;35:416-31.

Bardhoshi G, Duncan K, Erford BT. Psychometric meta‐analysis of the English version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. J Counsel Develop. 2016;94(3):356-73.

Desai S. Pragmatic prevention, permanent solution: Women’s experiences with hysterectomy in rural India. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:11–8.

Stolk Y, Kaplan I, Szwarc J. Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups. Inter J Meth Psych Res. 2014;23(2):161-83.

Gigase F, Hulsbosch LP, De Caluwé E, Pop VJ, Boekhorst MG. The Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale Revised (TPDS-R) Data from a Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Psych Res. 2022;156:511-9.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

How to Cite

Kulkarni, A. U., Kothiwale, T. D., & Moras, E. T. (2023). The obstetrics and gynaecological distress measurement scale: a promising tool for improving obstetrics care. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(7), 2077–2081. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231913

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles