Enhancing gynaecological care: the obstetrics and gynaecological distress measurement scale

Authors

  • Aditi U. Kulkarni Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India
  • Tanvi D. Kothiwale Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India
  • Elisa T. Moras Dr. Khanade Hospital, Pune Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231933

Keywords:

Distress, Gynaecology, Mental health, Obstetrics, Physical health, Psychiatry, Psychology, Stress

Abstract

Background: Gynaecological patients are evaluated using a few scales that are not population-targeted, so a targeted tool was required, particularly for the Indian population where these problems are prevalent.

Methods: A short interview was done after a top-down survey. Then, from the results of the pilot study, some items were retained after the deletion of others.

Results: Using Cronbach's alpha, a reliability coefficient of 0.907 was obtained. With a value of 0.867, the split-half coefficient demonstrated a good degree of internal consistency. Convergent validity was 0.62.

Conclusions: The OGDMS is a useful tool for detecting possible psychological distress in pregnant women. OGDMS is a standardised instrument which can be used by psychologists, physicians, and patients to pinpoint probable mental health-related problem areas.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Gao X, Yeh YC, Outley J, Simon J, Botteman M, Spalding J. Health-related quality of life burden of women with endometriosis: a literature review. Curr Med Res Op. 2006;22(9):1787-97.

Wenzel L, Vergote I, Cella D. Quality of life in patients receiving treatment for gynecologic malignancies: special considerations for patient care. Inter J Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;83:211-29.

Elsenbruch S, Hahn S, Kowalsky D, Öffner AH, Schedlowski M, Mann K, et al. Quality of life, psychosocial well-being, and sexual satisfaction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Cli Endocrinol Metabol. 2003;88(12):5801-7.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Gynecological diseases - level 3 cause, 2020. Available at: https://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/gynecological-diseases-level-3-cause. Accessed 17 March 2023.

Goswami P, Ahirwar G, Mishra P, Agrawal V. Adolescent gynaecological problems: a prospective study. J Evolu Med Dent Sci. 2015;4(102):16709-2.

Bajalan Z, Moafi F, MoradiBaglooei M, Alimoradi Z. Mental health and primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review. J Psychos Obstet Gynecol. 2019;40(3):185-94.

Quraishi SR, Waghachavare VB, Gore AD, Dhumale GB. Are menstrual problems associated with the mental health? A cross sectional study among the Graduation college girls. IIUM. 2015;14(2).

Himelein MJ, Thatcher SS. Polycystic ovary syndrome and mental health: a review. Obstet Gynecol Sur. 2006;61(11):723-32.

Smith BA, Georgiopoulos AM, Quittner AL. Maintaining mental health and function for the long run in cystic fibrosis. Ped Pulmonol. 2016;51(S44):S71-8.

Pandey S, Bhattacharya S. Impact of obesity on gynecology. Women’s Heal. 2010;6(1):107-17.

Joneja GS, Chopra S. Obstetrics–gynaecology and changed lifestyles of women. Med J Arm For India. 2012;68(1):2.

Kelly-Weeder S, Cox CL. The impact of lifestyle risk factors on female infertility. Wom Heal. 2007;44(4):1-23.

Wasser SK, Sewall G, Soules MR. Psychosocial stress as a cause of infertility. Fert Steril. 1993;59(3):685-9.

Desai S. Pragmatic prevention, permanent solution: Women's experiences with hysterectomy in rural India. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:11-8.

Beaulah P. Prevalence of gynaecological problems and their effect on working women. Ind J Cont Nurs Edu. 2018;19(1):103.

Pop VJ, Pommer AM, Pop-Purceleanu M, Wijnen HA, Bergink V, Pouwer F. Development of the Tilburg pregnancy distress scale: the TPDS. BMC Preg Child. 2011;11(1):1-8.

O’Connor M. Detecting distress: introducing routine screening in a gynecologic cancer setting. Number 1/February 2017. 2017;21(1):79-85.

Harbeck E, Chambers S, Porter‐Steele J, Anderson D, Sanmugarajah J, Hughes F, et al. Screening for distress in women with gynaecological cancer: adaptation of the distress thermometer for gynaecological oncology patients. Euro J Cancer Care. 2021;30(6):e13486.

Salter JR. Gynaecological symptoms and psychological distress in potential hysterectomy patients. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(2):155-9.

Barthelmess EK, Naz RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome current status and future perspective. Frontier Biosc. 2014;E6(1):104-19.

Stolk Y, Kaplan I, Szwarc J. Clinical use of the Kessler psychological distress scales with culturally diverse groups. Inter J Meth Psych Res. 2014;23(2):161-83.

Vannuccini S, Rossi E, Cassioli E, Cirone D, Castellini G, Ricca V, et al. Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MEDI-Q): a new tool to assess menstruation-related distress. Reprod BioMed Online. 2021;43(6):1107-16.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

How to Cite

Kulkarni, A. U., Kothiwale, T. D., & Moras, E. T. (2023). Enhancing gynaecological care: the obstetrics and gynaecological distress measurement scale. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(7), 2196–2200. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231933

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles