Cerebroplacental ratio and its relation to poor perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a cross sectional study in a tertiary care centre of Eastern India

Authors

  • Swati Kumari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubneshwar, Odisha, India
  • Samita Das Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubneshwar, Odisha, India
  • Rachita Pravalina Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubneshwar, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231927

Keywords:

Cerebroplacental ratio, Middle cerebral artery, Perinatal outcomes, Umblical artery

Abstract

Background: Detection of fetal growth abnormalities by fetal monitoring is a critical component of perinatal care. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), as measured by colour Doppler, has recently been demonstrated to be a reliable indicator of foetus health. CPR is calculated as ratio of pulsatility index of middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA).  When blood is redistributed in the early stages of hypoxia in favour of cerebral circulation, the diastolic flow amplitude increases above normal levels in MCA while umbilical flow in diastole decreases, providing CPR. This study aims to investigate the relationship between CPR and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Methods: After institutional ethical approval, a 2-year study was conducted on 226 pregnant women of age group 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies at 34-38 weeks with informed consent in a tertiary hospital in Eastern part of India. The MCA and UA pulsatility index were calculated using a doppler scan on each patient. When the cerebroplacental ratio is <1 it is deemed abnormal. The perinatal outcomes were observed and their associations were evaluated.

Results: There were 68/226 (30%) women had abnormal CPR (<1). CPR<1 was significantly associated with unfavourable perinatal outcomes (prematurity, low birth weight, NICU admission and perinatal hypoxia) with p value < 0.001.

Conclusions: CPR is important tool in predicting an unfavourable perinatal outcome.

References

Ferrazzi E, Vegni C, Bellotti M, Borboni A, Della Peruta S, Barbera A. Role of umbilical Doppler velocimetry in the biophysical assessment of the growth-retarded fetus: answers from neonatal morbidity and mortality. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10(6):309-15.

Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Merialdi A. Cerebral umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Cerebral and umbilical ratio. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(3):416-20.

Dubinsky T, Lau M, Powell F. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;52(11):673-5.

Divon MY, Ferber A. Doppler evaluation of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(4):1015-25.

Gilbert WM, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(6):1596-601.

Ebrashy A, Azmy O, Ibrahim M, Waly M, Edris A. Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well-being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case- control study. Croat Med J. 2005;46(5):821-5.

Bethold G, Jessika R, Dominik R, Ingo G, Bernd M, Judith S, et al. Correlation of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) with adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. In Vivo. 2019;33(5):1703-6.

Anna B, Karel M, Jana B, Ann T and Karin K. Cerebroplacental ratio as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in the third trimester. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;100(3):497-503.

Khalil A, Jose MR, Maddalena M, Hasina H, Amar B, Aris P and Basky T. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):e1-e54..

Subha S, Sankari M. Doppler study (cerebroplacental ratio) as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracep Gynecol. 2020;9(12):5068-74.

Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs CA, van Osch IR, Heymans MW, Ganzevoort W, Schoonmade LJ, Bax CJ, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;128(2):226-35.

Dall’Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G, Cancemi A, Aloisio F, Arduini D, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labour in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicentre study. Ultra Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;53(4):481-7

Gruettner B, Ratiu J, Ratiu D, Gottschalk I, Morgenstern B, Abel JS, et al. Correlation of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) with adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. In vivo. 2019;33(5):1703-6.

Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):288.e1-288.e5.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles