Changing trends in epidemiology and outcome in peripartum hysterectomy over a period of ten years in a tertiary care teaching institution

Authors

  • Chandramathy Kamalakshy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
  • Mohammed Siddiq Chundakkadan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
  • Suneetha Kalam Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231934

Keywords:

Classical caesarean section, Obstetric haemorrhage, Peripartum hysterectomy, Placenta previa accreta

Abstract

Background: Peripartum hysterectomy is a lifesaving procedure performed for severe obstetric complications such as major obstetric haemorrhage, abnormally invaded placenta, uterine rupture or sepsis. Objectives of the study was to  review the epidemiology of peripartum hysterectomies performed over a period of ten years from January 2012 to December2021 and to determine the trends in peripartum hysterectomies by comparing two different time periods.

Methods: In this retrospective descriptive study, the case records of peripartum hysterectomies performed at Government Medical College, Kozhikode between January 2012 and December 2021 were analysed. Results for 2012-2014 and 2019-2021 were compared to identify the changing trends.

Results: Total number of deliveries for 10 years was 147272, of which 53975 (36.64%) women underwent caesarean section. Total number of peripartum hysterectomies was 312 with incidence of 2.12 per 1000 deliveries. Comparing the data of 2012-14 with 2019-21, incidence was 2.11 and 2.45 per 1000 deliveries respectively. Placenta previa accreta was the commonest indication for peripartum hysterectomies in both periods. Classical caesarean section followed by hysterectomy in 53 cases (61.62%) during 2019-21 whereas only 6 cases (6.06%) during 2012-14.   Number of units of blood and blood products received was less during 2019-21 period, 56(65.11%) received only1-3 units whereas 48 (48.48%) received more than 3units during the period 2012-14.

Conclusions: Placenta previa accreta was the most common indication for hysterectomy during 2019-21. Classical caesarean section followed by hysterectomy in placenta previa accreta can reduce haemorrhage and need for transfusions.

References

Govindappagari S, Wright JD, Ananth CV, Huang Y, D'Alton ME, Friedman AM. Risk of peripartum hysterectomy and centre hysterectomy and delivery volume. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1215.

Kallianidis AF, Maraschini A, Danis J, Colmorn LB, Deneux‐Tharaux C, Donati S, et al. Epidemiological analysis of peripartum hysterectomy across nine European countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(10):1364-73.

Temizkan O, Angın D, Karakuş R, Şanverdi İ, Polat M, Karateke A. Changing trends in emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric centre in Turkey during 2000-2013. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016;17(1):26-34.

Ozden S, Yildirim G, Basaran T, Gurbuz B, Dayicioglu V. Analysis of 59 cases of emergent peripartum hysterectomies during a 13-year period. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271:363-7.

Yildirim GY, Koroglu N, Akca A, Talmac M, Dikmen S, Yıldırım G, et al. What is new in peripartum hysterectomy? – A seventeen year experience in a tertiary hospital. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;60(1):95-8.

Parazzini F, Ricci E, Cipriani S, Chiaffarino F, Bortolus R, Chiantera V, et al. Temporal trends and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy in Lombardy, Northern Italy, 1996–2010. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:223-8.

Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Callaghan WM, Kuklina EV. Peripartum hysterectomy in the United States: nationwide 14 year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(1):63.e1-8.

Flood KM, Said S, Geary M, Robson M, Fitzpatrick C, Malone FD. Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):632.e1-6.

Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A prospective study in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124(2):187-92.

Singh N, Pandey K, Gupta R, Agarwal S, Chaudhary A, Ani A. Obstetric hysterectomy, still a life saving tool in modern day obstetrics: a five year study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(3):540-43.

Gungorduk K, Yildirim G, Dugan N, Polat I, Sudolmus S, Ark C. Peripartum hysterectomy in Turkey: a case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(7):22-8.

Yalcinkaya A, Guzel AI, Kangal K. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: 16-year experience of a medical hospital. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010;73(7):360-3.

Ozden S, Yildirim G, Basaran T, Gurbuz B, Dayicioglu V. Analysis of 59 cases of emergent peripartum hysterectomies during a 13-year period. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271:363-7.

Wright JD, Devine P, Shah M, Gaddipati S, Lewin SN, Simpson LL, et al. Morbidity and mortality of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1187-93.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles