Interrupted mattress versus continuous subcuticular versus stapler: a comparative study on wound closure outcomes in primary caesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision

Authors

  • Amrita Chaurasia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Kajal Jain Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vandana Ojha Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Nidhi Sachan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Vidhi Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231774

Keywords:

Mattress, Subcuticular, Staples, Wound complications, Patient satisfaction

Abstract

Background: Aim of the study was to compare the suture techniques using interrupted mattress and continuous subcuticular and stapler in terms of wound closure time; pain in stitch line on post-operative day 3, 5 and 7 and patient satisfaction.

Methods: All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were divided into 3 categories (interrupted mattress, subcuticular and staples) by random selection. Assessment parameters being skin closure time; induration and discharge on day 4 and 8; pain score using visual analogue scale on day 3, day 5 and 7; wound gaping and Patient satisfaction in terms of cosmesis using Likert’s scale after 4-6 weeks.

Results: The skin closure time in mattress, subcuticular sutures and staples are found to be 8.891±1.343; 11.390±1.438 and 1.518±0.502 respectively. Pain on day 3, 5 and 7 were: severe pain was maximum seen in staples group (n=21) as compared to 7 patients in subcuticular group and 6 in mattress group. Wound complications were seen least in mattress group. One patient (1.20%) had wound gaping in mattress group, 3 (3.65%) of the patients in subcuticular group and 5 (6.17%) in staples group had wound gaping. Patient dissatisfaction rate was higher in staples group (8.64%) as compared to 6.09% patient in subcuticular group and 4.8% in mattress group.

Conclusions: The mattress suturing technique has least wound related complications and most patients satisfaction. Staples are quick in application and subcuticular technique gives a good scar, but is associated with similar complications as staples.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmetic Laser Therapy. 2010;12(6):296-302

Zuber TJ. The mattress sutures: vertical, horizontal, and corner stitch. Am Family Physician. 2002;66(12):2231.

Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. Subcuticular suture. J Reproduct Med. 1997;42(10):627-30.

Hlubek R, Walder P, Káňa J, Salounová D. Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Chirurgiae Orthop et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca. 2014;1;81(3):233-7.

Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340.

Arpitha MR, Kumar A, Sreelatha S. Comparative study of wound healing, pain and cosmetic results by staples versus subcuticular skin suture after caesarean delivery. Int J Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2022;6(3):01-11.

Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs References 63 subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2009;200(3):265-e1.

Abdus-Salam RA, Bello FA, Olayemi O. A randomized study comparing skin staples with subcuticular sutures for wound closure at caesarean section in black-skinned women. Int Scholarly Res Notices. 2014;2014.

Patel K. Comparison between interrupted vertical mattress suture versus skin stapler versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in clean surgery. Int J Res Med. 2014;3(3);164-8.

Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;203(3):285-e1.

Shwetha BR, Nair RV, Pillai JT, Solanke PV. Comparison between interrupted vertical mattress suture versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in Caesarean section at SMIMS. Int J Res Rev. 2016;3(2):33-6.

Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetr Gynecol. 2011;117(3):682-90.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-07

How to Cite

Chaurasia, A., Jain, K., Ojha, V., Sachan, N., & Singh, V. (2023). Interrupted mattress versus continuous subcuticular versus stapler: a comparative study on wound closure outcomes in primary caesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(7), 2015–2020. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231774

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles