Study of fetomaternal outcome in emergency peripartum hysterectomy at pannadhay zanana hospital, Udaipur, India

Authors

  • Priyanka Ahari Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Nisha Patidar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Gautam Lal Damor Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Balveer Jakhar drpriyanka.ahari92@gmail.com
  • Neeraj Choudhary Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231788

Keywords:

Peripartum hysterectomy, PPH, Rupture uterus

Abstract

Background: Peripartum or obstetric hysterectomy is the removal of the corpus uteri alone or with the cervix at the time of a caesarean section or shortly after a vaginal delivery. On one hand, it is the last resort to save a woman's life and on the other hand, her reproductive capability is sacrificed. Many times it is a very difficult decision and requires good clinical judgment. Most of the time the operation is carried out when the condition of patient is too critical to withstand the risks of anesthesia or surgery, but proper timing and meticulous care may reduce or prevent maternal complications.

Methods: The study is prospective study and was conducted on cases of peripartum emergency hysterectomy performed at PDZH, Udaipur, during the period from April 2021 to October 2022.

Results: Our study depicts following results on the basis of 31498 deliveries during the study period (April 2021 to October 2022), so the overall incidence of peripartum hysterectomy is 1 in 1049 (0.095%). Incidence of hysterectomy following vaginal delivery found to be 0.15%, whereas following caesarean incidence found to be 0.24%.

Conclusions: Increase in caesarean section rates may lead to a rise in the number of peripartum hysterectomies required in the future because of increased chances of scar dehiscence and morbidly adherent placenta and Thus, there is a need for institutions to reassess their indication for first caesarean section to decrease the incidence of caesarean sections.

 

References

Sturdee DW, Rushton DL. Cesarean and post partum hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 3:270-74.

Mantri L, Maheshwari K, Chandra. Emergency Hysterectomy a ten years review. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1995;43:936-39.

Jyotsana Lamba, Shashi Gupta. Role of emergency hysterectomy in modern obstetrics. JK Sci. 2012;14(1):22.

Jadav SN, Nanda S, Panchal G, Desai MR. Study of emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Med Sci. 2014;3(2).

Glaze S, Ekwalanga P, Roberts G, Lange I, Birch C. Peripartum Hysterectomy: 1999 To 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):732-8.

Zelop CM, Harlow BL, Frigoletto FD Jr, Safon LE, Saltzman DH. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(5):1443-8.

Chestnut DH, Eden RD, Gall SA, Parker RT. Peripartum hysterectomy: a review of cesarean and postpartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(3):365-70.

Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, et al. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1486-92.

Gabbe SG, Niebel JR, Simpson JL, Eds: Obstetrics Normal And Problem Pregnancies. 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; Chap 18: Cesarean Delivery; 2002:587-600.

Nichols DH. Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Chap. 68: Obstetric Operations; 1993:1126-1133.

Avery DM, Hooper DE, Waits JB. Cesarean hysterectomy for family medicine physicians practicing obstetrics. Am J Clin Med. 2009;6(2):68-71.

Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Uterine rupture and its complications in Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;128:257-61.

Malik HS. Frequency predisposing factors and fetomaternal outcome in uterine rupture. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2006;16(7):472-5.

Saleem S, Tahir S. Uterine rupture in pregnancy-one year experience. APMC. 2012;6(1):47-50.

Taipale P, Karhumaa J, Penttinen J. Two- and three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of incomplete uterine scar rupture during pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(4):418-9.

Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(4):321-7.

Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J, et al. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(1):72-7.

Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347(8997):281-4.

Phelan JP, Korst LM, Settles DK. Uterine activity patterns in uterine rupture: a case control study. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92(3):394-7.

World Health Organization. Attending to 136 million births, every year: make every mother and child count: The World Report 2005. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. 2005;3:62.

World Health organization, U.N.C.F, United Nations Population Fund and World Bank (2007). Maternal Mortality in 2005. Estimates Developed by WHO, UNFPA, and the World Bank, Geneva. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_mortality_2005UNICEF,/mme_2005.pdf. Accessed on 25 April 2023.

Chawla J, Arora CD, Paul M, Ajmani SN. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: A retrospective study from a teaching hospital in North India over eight years. Oman Med J. 2015;30(3):181.

Ahmad SN, Mir IH. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: experience at Apex Hospital of Kashmir Valley. J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;8(2).

Anita K, Kavita W. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2005;55(2):132-4.

Saima S, Jan SM, Shah AF, Yousuf A, Batra M. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in dentistry. J Oral Res Revi. 2016;8(1):36.

Sikora-Szczęśniak DL, Szczęśniak G, Szatanek M, Sikora W. Clinical analysis of 52 obstetric hysterectomies. Ginekol Polska. 2016;87(6):460-6.

Sarojini A. Clinical study of emergency peripartum hysterectomy postpartum hemorrhage. International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(4):1171-3.

Wakhloo A, Zarfashian A, Gupta S. A study of various factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Age (in years). 2016;20(1):2-5.

Prabhu R, Rao GK, Devi PK. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: an experience of 5 years. Int J Develop Res. 2015;5(9):5523-5.

Chawla J, Arora CD, Paul M, Ajmani SN. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy: A retrospective study from a teaching hospital in North India over eight years. Oman Med J. 2015;30(3):181.

Vijayan, Saraswathi. Review of peripartum hysterectomy cases in five years. IOSR. 2015;14(10).

Nohira T, Onodera T, Isaka K. Emergency postpartum hysterectomy: incidence, trends, indications, and complications. Hypert Res Preg. 2014;2(2):88-93.

Nooren M, Nawal R. Obstetric hysterectomy: a life saving emergency. Ind J Med Sci. 2013;67(5):99.

Agrawal S, Yadav R, Raghunandan C, Dhingra S, Kaur H. Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India. Asian J Med Sci. 2013;4(1):5-9.

Ferreira Carvalho J, Cubal A, Torres S, Costa F, Carmo OD. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 10-year review. International Scholarly Research Notices. 2012;2012.

Lovina SM. Machado, emergency peripartum hysterectomy: incidence, indications, risk factors and outcome. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3(8):358-61.

Sharma R, Pathak SJ. Peripartum hysterectomy review of 70 cases. South Asian Federat Obstet Gynecol. 2009;1(2):19-21.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-19

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles