Burden, maternal risk factors, and fetal outcomes in twin pregnancies: a retrospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20232468Keywords:
Twin pregnancies, Maternal complications, Fetal outcomes, Mode of delivery, Risk factorsAbstract
Background: Twin pregnancies present significant challenges for obstetricians worldwide. Although they account for a relatively small percentage of global births, their occurrence varies across different regions. The increasing utilization of assisted reproduction techniques and the advancing maternal age contribute to the growing incidence of twin pregnancies. As a result, it is essential to understand the implications and risks associated with multiple gestations. The objective was to determine the burden of twin pregnancies, identify maternal risk factors, assess fetal outcomes, and explore potential associations between these factors.
Methods: Data were collected from hospital records, including information on maternal age, parity, method of conception, gestational age, pregestational body mass index (BMI), and family history. Maternal and fetal complications, mode of delivery, and high-risk conditions in the fetuses were documented. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher-exact test.
Results: The study included 78 twin pregnancies. The majority of women (78.2%) fell within the age range of 21-30 years. The majority of women (70.5%) had a normal pregestational BMI. Preterm births occurred in 24.3% of twin pregnancies. Hypertensive disorders (24.0%) and foetal malpresentation (38.0%) were common indications for cesarean section. Fetal complications included intrauterine growth restriction (11.5%), birth weight discordance (25.0%), early neonatal deaths (14.7%), and low APGAR scores (16.0%).
Conclusions: Twin pregnancies present challenges due to the increased risks of maternal complications, preterm birth, and adverse fetal outcomes. The study emphasizes the need for careful management and monitoring of twin pregnancies to improve outcomes.
References
Siddalingappa H, Narayana Murthy MR, Kulkarni P, Ashok NC. Prevalence and factors influencing perinatal mortality in rural Mysore, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2796-99.
Christopher D, Robinson BK, Peaceman AM. An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(3/4):109-16.
Smits J, Monden C. Twinning across the Developing World. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25239.
Sharma K. The twinning rates and epidemiological characteristics of births in southeast Uttar Pradesh, India. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1997;46(1):47-56.
Kagne S, Thawal Y, Tambe SK. Study of obstetric complications & outcome of twin pregnancy. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2014;3(53):12252-62.
Mcdowell S, Kroon B, Yazdani A. Clomiphene ovulation induction and higher-order multiple pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53(4).
Gardosi J. Toward safe standards for assessment of fetal growth in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;431-3.
Vogel JP, Torloni MR, Seuc A, Betrán AP, Widmer M, Souza JP, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancy in 23 low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e70549.
Mathew R, Wills V, Abraham J. Maternal determinants and fetal outcome of twin pregnancy: A five-year survey. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:2459-65.
Su RN, Zhu WW, Wei YM, Wang C, Feng H, Lin L, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies: A multicentre study in the Beijing population. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015;1(4):197-202.
Rezavand N, Veisi F, Malek-khosravi Sh, Zangeneh M, Kohzadi M. Assessment of frequency of twin pregnancy and neonatal outcome in deliveries of Mo'tazedi Hospital, Kermanshah in 2004-2007. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(1):19-22.
Konar H, Sarkar M, Paul J. Perinatal outcome of the second twin at a tertiary care center in India. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(6):441-7.
