Fertility outcomes in microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia

Simmi Mahour; Sreelakshmy R. Nair

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233642

Authors

Simmi Mahour Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lifeline Superspeciality Hospital, Adoor, Kerala, India
Sreelakshmy R. Nair Department of Reproductive Medicine, Lifeline Superspeciality Hospital, Adoor, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233642

Keywords:

FSH levels, Microdissection testicular sperm extraction, Non-obstructive azoospermia

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcome of micro dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Methods: We retrospectively analysed data of 96 consecutive patients with clinical NOA who were treated with micro TESE by single surgeon, between January 2022 and December 2022, in Lifeline superspeciality hospital Adoor, Kerela. Embryological and clinical outcomes were demonstrated based on ICSI-IVF cycles using fresh or frozen sperms, different etiologies of NOA and various counts of sperms retrieved.

Results: 96 men underwent micro TESE and 72.9% (70/96) of them had sperms retrieved. ICSI performed in 64 couples. Of those, 41 reached the stage of embryo transfer (ET). Of the couples who underwent embryo transferred, 18 (43%) resulted in biochemical pregnancies and 7 (17%) clinical pregnancies. There was a significant difference in the testicular volume and serum FSH levels between micro-TESE positive and negative groups (p=0.000). Retrieval rates were higher in group of men with normal testicular volume and FSH<12. Clinical pregnancy rate was around 11% in couples who had sperms retrieved by micro TESE. The sperm retrieval rates were higher in men with age <40 years. Similarly younger the female age more was the pregnancy rate. Out of various etiologies idiopathic NOA and Klinefelter syndrome had better sperm retrieval rate in our study which was statistically significant. Total fertilization rate and blasts rates were 79.7% and 51.6% out of ICSI.

Conclusions: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction is an effective treatment for NOA with higher rate of sperm retrieval and pregnancy rate. The increasing success rates over several years indicate the importance of surgical skill and laboratory staff experience.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):873-82.

Tournaye H, Krausz C, Oates RD. Concepts in diagnosis and therapy for male reproductive impairment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(7):554-64.

Pan MM, Hockenberry MS, Kirby EW, Lipshultz LI. Male infertility diagnosis and treatment in the era of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(2):337-47.

Corona G, Pizzocaro A, Lanfranco F, Garolla A, Pelliccione F, Vignozzi L, et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in Klinefelter syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):265-75.

Dohle GR, Halley DJ, Van Hemel JO, van den Ouwel AM, Pieters MH, Weber RF, et al. Genetic risk factors in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Hum Reorod. 2002;17(1):13-6.

Krausz C. Male infertility: pathogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25(2):271-85.

Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1457-60.

Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for non- obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1099-103.

Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):131-5.

Arshad MA, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. Predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(11):2015-38.

Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Takao T, Fujita K, Koga M, et al. Prediction of successful outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2004;172(5):1944-7.

Ishikawa T, Nose R, Yamaguchi K, Chiba K, Fujisawa M. Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):1008-11.

Ramasamy R, Reifsnyder JE, Bryson C, Zaninovic N, Liotta D, Cook CA, et al. Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):299-302.

WHO. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 6th ed. WHO: Geneva; 2023.

Esteves SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermia men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Hum Reprod Sci. 2005;5:233-43.

Liu H, Liu J Chen S, Kang X, Du H, Li L. Elevated incidence of monozygotic twinning is associated with extended embryo culture, but not with zona pellucida manipulation or freeze- thaw procedure. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:1044-50.

Racowsky C, Stern JE, Gibbons WE, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Biggers JD. National collection of embryo morphology data into society for assisted reproductive technology clinic outcomes reporting system: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1985-9.

Silber SJ. Microsurgical TESE and the distribution of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2278-84.

Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37:570-83.

Sabbaghian M, Modarresi T, Hosseinifar H, Hosseini J, Farrahi F, Dadkhah F, et al. Comparison of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in patients with and without Klinefelter syndrome. Urology. 2014;83:107-10.

Ramasamy R, Trivedi NN, Reifsnyder JE, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:653-5.

Karamazak S, Kizilay F, Bahceci T, Semerci B. Do body mass index, hormone profile and testicular volume effect sperm retrieval rates of microsurgical sperm extraction in the patients with nonobstructive azoospermia? Turk J Urol. 2018;44:202-7.

Salehi P, Derakhshan-Horeh M, Nadeali Z, Hosseinzadeh M, Sadeghi E, Izadpanahi MH, et al. Factors influencing sperm retrieval following testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia patients. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44:22-7.

Chen SC, Hsieh JT, Yu HJ, Chang HC. Appropriate cut-off value for follicle-stimulating hormone in azoospermia to predict spermatogenesis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:108-11.

Abdel Raheem A, Garaffa G, Rushwan N, De Luca F, Zacharakis E, Abdel Raheem T, et al. Testicular histopathology as a predictor of a positive sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. BJU Int. 2013;111:492-9.

Ghanem M, Bakr NI, Elgayaar MA, EI Mongy S, Fathy H, Ibrahim AH. Comparison of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia in the first cycle: a report of case series and meta-analysis. Int J Androl. 2005;28(1):16-21.

Gao S, Yang X, Xiao X, Yin S, Guan Y, Chen Y. Outcomes and affecting factors for ICSI and micro TESE treatments in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different etiologies: a retrospective analysis-Front. Endocrinol. 2022;13:1006208.