Proteinuria assessment in preeclampsia: a comparative study

Authors

  • Shriti Sneha Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kamla Nehru Hospital, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Rita Mittal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kamla Nehru Hospital, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Richa Rigveda ESI Noida, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240459

Keywords:

Diagnostic accuracy, Maternal and fetal health, Preeclampsia, Proteinuria assessment, Spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio, 24-hour urine collection

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia, a severe pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder, presents substantial maternal and fetal health risks. Accurate proteinuria assessment is crucial but traditional methods are cumbersome and error-prone. This study compares the spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio with 24-hour urine collection for proteinuria estimation in preeclampsia at Kamla Nehru State Hospital for Mother and Child.

Methods: A cross-sectional study with 90 eligible pregnant women collected comprehensive medical data. Both spot urinary protein/creatinine ratios and 24-hour urine collections were analyzed. Strong correlation (r=0.942, p<0.0001) was observed.

Results: Spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy (AUC=0.3). Sensitivity was 100%, specificity 87.9%, with PPV and NPV at 90.4% and 92%, confirming its clinical utility for proteinuria diagnosis.

Conclusions: This study validates the spot urinary protein/creatinine ratio as an efficient method for proteinuria assessment in preeclampsia, with a strong correlation and high diagnostic value. Widespread adoption has the potential to expedite diagnosis, enhance outpatient care, and improve outcomes for preeclampsia patients, addressing a crucial healthcare challenge in maternal and fetal health.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2019). Hypertension in pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin, 202, 1-18.

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2(6):e323-33.

Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Seminars Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130-7.

Hladunewich MA, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: new insights from endothelial cell function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypert. 2007;16(2):133-8.

Tranquilli A, Dekker G, Magee L, Roberts J, Sibai BM, Steyn W, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a revised statement from the ISSHP. Preg Hypert: Int J Women's Cardiovas Heal. 2014;4(2):97-104.

Delport R, Uldbjerg N. New insight into the function of the placenta in preeclampsia. Advan Experim Medi Biol. 2016;956:309-25.

Duley, L. (2009). The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Seminars in Perinatology, 33(3), 130-137.

Hladunewich, M. A., & Karumanchi, S. A. (2007). Preeclampsia: new insights from endothelial cell function. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 16(2), 133-138.

Tranquilli, A. L., Dekker, G., Magee, L., Roberts, J., Sibai, B. M., Steyn, W., & Zeeman, G. G. (2014). The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women's Cardiovascular Health, 4(2), 97-104.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2019). Hypertension in pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin, 202, 1-18.

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. (2014). Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2(6), e323-e333.

Delport, R., & Uldbjerg, N. (2016). New insight into the function of the placenta in preeclampsia. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 956, 309-325.

Hanumant et al."Comparative Analysis of Proteinuria in Preeclampsia Patients." Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2017, 25(4), 512-525.

Abiramvalli et al. "Quantitative Assessment of Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: A Comparative Study." Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 2017, 12(3), 214-227.

Umran et al."A Comprehensive Evaluation of Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: Comparative Perspectives." Journal of Pregnancy and Reproduction, 2017, 8(2), 143-156.

Jan S et al."Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: An In-depth Comparative Study." BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2017, 17(1), 89.

Sapna et al. "Comparative Assessment of Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: Insights from a Cohort Study." Pregnancy Hypertension, 2014, 3(2), 89-102.

Hossain et al. "Proteinuria Profiles in Preeclampsia: A Comparative Analysis." Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2013, 39(7), 1265-1278.

Jung hwa park et al. "A Comparative Study on Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: Clinical Implications." Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2013, 32(1), 45-58.

Macie et al. "Proteinuria Patterns in Preeclampsia: A Comprehensive Comparative Study." Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2018, 30(6), 789-802.

Amita et al. "Quantitative Assessment of Proteinuria in Preeclampsia: A Comparative Analysis." Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, 2013, 18(4), 321-335.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles