Post operative wound gape in obstetric and gynaecological surgeries

Authors

  • Aswathi Vijay Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi Hospital, Govandi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Jayanth Chilkund Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi Hospital, Govandi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Siddhi Kore Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi Hospital, Govandi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Saroj Kumari Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi Hospital, Govandi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233644

Keywords:

Wound gape, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Post operative wound infection

Abstract

Background: Despite advances made in asepsis, post operative wound infection is one of the major causes for increased postoperative morbidity and huge economic burden for patient and healthcare. This study was undertaken to identify risk factors for the post operative wound gaping in obstetrical and gynaecological surgeries.

Methods: Retrospective observational study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of Pt. Madan Mohan Malviya Shatabdi hospital, Govandi, Mumbai for the year 2022.

Results: 1611 cases were analysed that underwent various obstetrical and gynaecological surgeries. Post operative wound gaping incidence was 1.5 %. Most of the cases were seen in less than 34 years of age. 21% of cases reported with wound gaping and discharge within 5-7 days of surgery while 79% of cases reported gape after 7 days of surgery. 54% cases with wound gape were obstetric. The most commonly known associated risk factor was found to be diabetes mellitus (12.5%) followed by anaemia (8.3%), obesity (4.2%) and hypertension (4.2%). 62.49% of post operative surgical wound gape were multiparous. It is seen that in all these cases of wound gape the subcutaneous tissue was sutured separately as a layer with absorbable suture material- Vicryl no 1-0 or Vicryl no 2-0.

Conclusions: Factors affecting post operative wound gaping are diabetes mellitus, anaemia, hypertension, obesity, chemoprophylaxis given prior to surgery, surgical method of wound closure and type of surgery. Standard wound closure techniques, correction of the avoidable known risk factors would provide a better outcome.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Oslon M, Lee JT. Continuous 10 year wound infection surveillance. Arch Surg. 1990;125:749-803.

Ganguly PS, Khan Y, Malik A. Nosocomial infection and hospital procedures. Indian J Commun Med. 2000; 25:39-43

Kamat US, Fereirra AMA, Kulkarni MS, Motghare DD. A prospective study of surgical site infection in a teaching hospital in Goa. Indian J Surg. 2008;70:120-4.

Narang R, Nandmer GK, Sapkal R. Faxtors affecting post operative wound gaping and their outcome in obstetrical and gynecological abdominal surgeries. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:1530-3.

Martin ASMR. Wound infection in planned abdominal surgery. Bangla Coll Physic Surg J. 1981.

Malhotra R, Walia GA. Study on factors affecting post operative wound infection. Int J Com Health and Med Res. 2015;1(1):17-21.

Rahman J, Sultana N, Hasan M, Begum HA. Factors of post-operative wound infection in abdominal surgeries of obstetric and gynaecological department. J Dhaka Nation Med Coll Hosp. 2012;18(1):39-42.

Alberti KG, Thomas DJ. The management of diabetes during surgery. BR J Anaesth. 1979;51(7);693-710.

Houang ET, Watson C, Howell R, Chapman M. Ampicillin combined with sulbactam or metronidazole for single-dose chemoprophylaxis in major gynaecological surgery. J Antimicro Chemoth. 1984; 14(5):529-35.

Kore S, Vyavaharkar ME, Akolekar R, Toke A, Ambiye V. Comparison of closure of subcutaneous tissue versus non-closure in relation to wound disruption after abdominal hysterectomy in obese patients. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46(1):26.

Allaire AD, Fisch J, McMahon MJ. Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A prospective, randomized trial. J Reprod Med. 2000;45(4):327-31.

Ramsey PS, White AM, Guinn DA, Lu GC, Ramin SM, Davies JK, et al. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5):967-73.

Chelmow D, Rodriguez EJ, Sabatini MM. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):974-80.

Gurusamy KS, Toon CD, Allen VB, Davidson BR. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 14(2):CD365.

Agrawal CS, Tiwari P, Mishra S, Rao A, Hadke NS, Adhikari S, et al. Interrupted abdominal closure prevents burst: randomized controlled trial comparing interrupted-x and conventional continuous closures in surgical and gynecological patients. Indian J Surg. 2014;76(4):270-6.

Kataria K, Ranjan P, Srivastava A. Stop Suturing Like Cobbler. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:472-4.

Lober CW, Fenske NA. Suture materials for closing the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Aesth Plast Surg. 1986;10:245-7.

Gadhvi AS, Bhimani DA, Gadhvi UI, Rajgor DK. A study of skin closure of surgical wound by subcuticular sutures with polyglactin 910 fast (rapide vicryl) in planned surgery. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:3370-4.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Vijay, A., Chilkund, J., Siddhi Kore, & Saroj Kumari. (2023). Post operative wound gape in obstetric and gynaecological surgeries . International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12(12), 3614–3618. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233644

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles