Maternal request caesarean sections: fear tops the list
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20234090Keywords:
Caesarean section, CDMR, Maternal request, On demand caesareanAbstract
Background: The increasing demand for caesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR) is adding to the increasing caesarean rates worldwide. Pregnant women and families choose a CDMR for several reasons that include social, economic, and cultural contexts. This study was done in a south Indian state to explore the common local reasons for CDMR, as a first step to reduce this trend.
Methods: Prospective observational, semi structured interview-based study of women who had chosen CDMR. Women with multifetal pregnancy and with previous caesarean sections were excluded. The primary outcomes were the reasons to choose a caesarean section over vaginal birth. The reasons were collected and divided into three themes: social and cultural, emotional reasons and personal previous experiences.
Results: Ninety-two women gave consent to participate in the study and were interviewed. The most common reason to choose a caesarean in the absence of any medical indication was ‘fear’ of harm to the mother or baby, trauma, or vaginal examinations by 65 out of 92 women (70.65%). Theme of social influence was quoted as the reason by seven (7.6%) and previous personal experience with birth outcomes was cited by three women (3.2%). The majority chose CDMR in the antenatal period even before they set into labour.
Conclusions: Fear was the most common reason for choosing a CDMR, representing a misconception that caesarean birth is a safer, better alternative for the woman and her family. There is a need for change in discussions around antenatal care options, exploration of fears, and support systems to make a better-informed choice.
Metrics
References
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e73-e77.
Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
Harrison MS, Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, Chomba E, Carlo WA, Garces AL, Goldenberg RL, et al. A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(4):410-20.
Wells JC, Wibaek R, Poullas M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):24-5.
Li HT, Hellerstein S, Zhou YB, Liu JM, Blustein J. Trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2018. JAMA. 2020;323(1):89-91.
Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T. China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015;122(2):160-4.
Ramires de Jesus G, Ramires de Jesus N, Peixoto-Filho FM, Lobato G. Caesarean rates in Brazil: what is involved? BJOG. 2015;122(5):606-9.
Roy N, Mishra PK, Mishra VK, Chattu VK, Varandani S, Batham SK. Changing scenario of C section delivery in India: Understanding the maternal health concern and its associated predictors. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:4182-8.
National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1386-97.
Ecker J. Elective cesarean delivery on maternal request. JAMA. 2013;309(18):1930-6.
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-70.
Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):57.
BDSS Corp. Released 2020. coGuide Statistics software, Version 2.0, India: BDSS corp. - https://reapv2.coguide.in/
Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Downe S et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1358-68.
Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Villar J et al; World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490-9.
Panda S, Jha V, Singh AS. Review of cesarean section on maternal request in a tertiary care institute; scenario in developing country. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2013;11(44):349-54.
Robson SJ, Tan WS, Adeyemi A, Dear KB. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia. Birth. 2009;36(3):208-12.
Pinar G, Avsar F, Aslantekin F. Evaluation of the impact of childbirth education classes in turkey on adaptation to pregnancy process, concerns about birth, rate of vaginal birth, and adaptation to maternity: a case-control study. Clin Nurs Res. 2018;27(3):315-342.
Afshar Y, Wang ET, Mei J, Esakoff TF, Pisarska MD, Gregory KD. Childbirth education class and birth plans are associated with a vaginal delivery. Birth. 2017;44(1):29-34.
O'Connell MA, Leahy-Warren P, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, O'Neill SM. Worldwide prevalence of tocophobia in pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):907-920.
Gosselin P, Chabot K, Béland M, Goulet-Gervais L, Morin AJ. Fear of childbirth among nulliparous women: Relations with pain during delivery, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and postpartum depressive symptoms. Encephale. 2016;42(2):191-6.
Saisto T, Halmesmäki E. Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(3):201-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
