DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162116

A comparative study of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device acceptance between primiparous and multiparous women in a tertiary care centre

Sushila Kharkwal, Sanjaya Sharma, Kumari Manisha

Abstract


Background: According to Census 2011 the population of India on 1 March 2011 was 1, 210, 193, 422. In spite of availability of wide range of contraceptives, the unmet need for family planning in India is estimated to be 21.3% by DLHS III survey. IUDs are the most commonly used method of reversible contraception worldwide.

Methods: It was a prospective, comparative, interventional study conducted over a period of one year at department of obstetrics and gynaecology, MLB medical college Jhansi, comprised of 306 women divided into two groups. Females in group A (129) were primiparous and in group B (207) were multiparous. All antenatal women between 36-42 weeks of gestation who anticipate delivery and counseled were included. Medical eligibility criteria were used for client assessment.

Results: Majority of the females (around 50%) in both groups counseled prior to caesarean section. Around 43.7% females in both groups were counseled during early labour. Rest 5% females were counseled during their antenatal visits. There were 57.85% multiparous women who accepted PPIUCD. In primiparous women acceptance of PPIUCD was 42.15%. Acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) was significantly higher in multipara (57.85%). Most common reason behind acceptance was postpartum family planning (PPFP) counseling (~60%). Most common reason in multiparous women (57.84%) was completed family. Others common reasons were motivated by ASHA (11.11%), 6.54% wanted birth spacing.

Conclusions: Acceptance of PPIUCD was significantly higher in multiparous women than primiparous. Most common reason behind this increased acceptance was PPFP counseling.


Keywords


PPIUCD, Acceptance, PPFP counseling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Census of India, provisional population totals, figures at a glance; 2011.

District level household and facility survey III (DLHS III). Ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India; 2007-08.

IUCD reference manual for medical officers and nursing personnel; 2013.

Hall JE. The female reproductive system, infertility and contraception, Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18th edition, chapter; 347:3037-38.

Williams textbook of Obstetrics, 23rd edition, Contraception, chapter 32; 684.

Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan JM. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with inter pregnancy interval: cross sectional study. Br Med J. 2000;321(7271):1255-9.

Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(15):1809-23.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Van Vliet H, Stanwood N. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD003036.

Katheit G, Agarwalet J. Evaluation of post-placental intrauterine device (PPIUCD) in terms of awareness, acceptance, and expulsion in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):539-43.

Mohamed SA, Kamel MA, Shaaban OM, Salem HT. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: The Assiut experience. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12(3):170-5.