A cross-sectional study to evaluate uploader-based quality and reliability of content on YouTube about endometriosis

Shereece Clarke; Monica Ghotra; Mahima Kuruvila; Aarushi Venkatraman; Vasishtha A. Upadrasta; Khrystyna Melnyk

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240776

Authors

Shereece Clarke Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical Science University of the West Indies, Jamaica
Monica Ghotra Department of Internal Medicine, Sri Guru Ram Dass Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Punjab, India
Mahima Kuruvila Department of Internal Medicine, Caribbean Medical University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Aarushi Venkatraman Department of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Vasishtha A. Upadrasta Department of General Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Khrystyna Melnyk Department of Paediatrics, St. George’s University School of Medicine, Grenada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20240776

Keywords:

Educational content online, Fertility, Video power index, Reliability score, Global quality score, YouTube, Endometriosis, Infertility

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is characterized by the development and presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside of the uterine cavity. Reflux of endometrial tissue fragments, cells, and protein-rich fluid into the pelvis during menstruation is considered the most important mechanism for the development of endometriosis, which is termed reflux menstruation. This study aims to assess quality and reliability of information on YouTube related to endometriosis.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study of YouTube videos was conducted in April 2023. Videos related to endometriosis were searched by six authors, easy using one search term. Relevant videos in English or Hindi language of duration 1-20 minutes were included in the study. These were evaluated for type of uploader, popularity, type of content and lastly quality and reliability using global quality score (GQS) and DISCERN scores respectively.

Results: The 67 relevant videos conveying Endometriosis related information had 21,620,808 views, 120,830 likes and 11,655 comments. Around 31 (46.3%) of videos uploaded were by doctors and health care organizations, outnumbering those uploaded by news channels 14 (20.9%), patients 5 (7.5%), and others 17 (25.4%). 59 (88.06%) of these videos described symptoms of endometriosis, and 67.1% presented the cause or etiology. A total of 47 (70.1%) of videos discussed information regarding treatment options.

Conclusions: YouTube videos have a wide reach among audience. In this study it was found that there was no significant difference in the quality, reliability or video power index (VPI) of videos uploaded by different types of uploaders. It is important to ensure that content with high quality and reliability is available from qualified medical professionals and organizations; for viewers to understand their disease and take treatment decisions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Mehedintu C, Plotogea MN, Ionescu S, Antonovici M. Endometriosis still a challenge. J Med Life. 2014;7(3):349-57.

Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ. 2022;379:e070750.

Nisenblat V, Prentice L, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Hull ML, Johnson N. Combination of the non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7(7):CD012281.

Helming AG, Adler DS, Keltner C, Igelman AD, Woodworth GE. The Content Quality of YouTube Videos for Professional Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Acad Med. 2021;96(10):1484-93.

Lee KN, Tak HJ, Park SY, Park ST, Park SH. YouTube as a source of information and education on endometriosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(38):e30639.

Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(1):e1-e8.

Lee KN, Son GH, Park SH, Kim Y, Park ST. YouTube as a Source of Information and Education on Hysterectomy. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(25):e196.

Steeb T, Reinhardt L, Harlaß M, Heppt MV, Meier F, Berking C. Assessment of the Quality, Understandability, and Reliability of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Basal Cell Carcinoma: Web-Based Analysis. JMIR Cancer. 2022;8(1):e29581.

Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-11.

Holowka EM. Mediating Pain: Navigating Endometriosis on Social Media. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2022;3:889990.

Kaya C, Usta T, Baghaki HS, Oral E. Relation between educational reliability and viewer interest in YouTube® videos depicting endometrioma cystectomy surgical techniques. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(3):101808.

Van den Haspel K, Reddington C, Healey M, Li R, Dior U, Cheng C. The role of social media in management of individuals with endometriosis: A cross-sectional study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;62(5):701-6.

Sinha R, Shibata R, Patel A, Sternchos JA. Social Media in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: What Is #Trending on Instagram? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(10):1730-4.

Carneiro MM, Farace BL, Ribeiro LSC, Silverio RCCC, Moreira T, Filho ALDS, et al. Using social media to educate women and healthcare providers on endometriosis: preliminary results. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020;24(1):9-12.

Goel R, Modhukur V, Täär K, Salumets A, Sharma R, Peters M. Users' Concerns About Endometriosis on Social Media: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e45381.