Open surgical retrieval of ovarian migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241086Keywords:
Intrauterine device, Contraceptives, ComplicationAbstract
Intraovarian migration of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a rare complication, only few cases have been reported. Arguably no reported case in Nigeria to best of knowledge. The patient was Mrs. S.I, a 29-year-old primiparous presented with a 6-hour history of abdominal pain, the pain was said to be sudden in onset pain associated with vomiting. She used an IUD for contraception for about 2 years prior to her presentation. The physical examination showed a patient with good hemodynamic and ventilatory status. Abdominal and vaginal examination revealed marked tenderness at suprapubic and left iliac region, with positive cervical excitation and left adnexal tenderness respectively. Provisional diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease was made, empirical broad spectrum antibiotic therapy commenced, pelvic scanning done revealed a hyperechoic structure, likely intrauterine device, perforating the uterine fundus and extending into the left ovary. Subsequently, she had laparotomy and the removal of the device. She did well post-surgery and was discharged home to follow in the clinic on the third day after surgery. Intraovarian migration of IUD is one of the rare complications of the device. High index of suspicion with radiological imaging support is necessary in making the diagnosis in a woman of reproductive age group with IUD in- situ regardless of the visible IUD string or not.
Metrics
References
Koh AS. Neglected Intrauterine Device Migration Complications: Case Reports. Women’s Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023;4(1):11-8.
Johannes B. Long-term contraceptive care in obese and superobese women. In: Tahir AM, Sabaratnam A, Frank AC; Obesity and Gynecology.2nd ed. Netherland: Elsevier. 2020;57-65.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contraception. 2016;7:19-32.
Baroud O, Ikouch K, El Assaad H, Imami Y, Mahdaoui S, Boufettal H. Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device: about a case. Int J Adv Res. 2021;9(02):986-9.
Kaushik A, Rajpurohit DS, Chaturvedy K, Vishnoi S, Panduranga AH, Kammar AA, et al. Partial uterine perforation and ovarian embedment of misplaced intrauterine device: a case report. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(12):5115.
Diaouga HS, Yacouba MC, Soumaila H, Garba MR, Idi N, Nayama M. Intraovarian migration of the intrauterine device; complicated by haemorrhagic ovarian cyst. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(8):2260-3.
Kart M, Gülecen T, Üstüner M. Intravesical migration of missed intrauterine device associated with stone formation: A case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Urol. 2015;2015:1-4.
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015;91(4):274-9.
Verma U, Verma N. Ovarian embedding of a transmigrated intrauterine device: A case report and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(2):275-8.
Bouzouba W, Alaoui FZ, Jayi S, Bouguern H, Melhouf MA. Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device diagnosed 20 years after insertion: report of a case. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:7.
Diouf1 AA, Diallo M, Gassama O, Niang MM, Thiam M, Gueye M, et al. Migration of intrauterine device into the pelvic cavity: exploration strategy and management in African environment. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(2):757-60.