Prevalence and determinants of cesarean section in a rural tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Fatema Begum Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shahabuddin Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Saida Akter Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ashulia Women and Children Hospital, Ashulia, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Arshad Jahan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gonoshasthaya Samajvittik Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Luna Farhana Hoque Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shahabuddin Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • M. Nasrin Aktar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital, Sirajganj, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241053

Keywords:

Caesarean section rate, Determinants, Indications, Prevalence, Repeat cesarean section

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section (CS) stands as the foremost major surgical procedure in contemporary obstetrics. Initially developed primarily to safeguard maternal life during challenging childbirth scenarios, its prevalence has shown a concerning upward trajectory in recent times. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and determinants of Cesarean section deliveries in a rural tertiary care hospital.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study and was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj, Bangladesh during the period from January 2018 to December 2019.

Results: Out of a total of 1600 deliveries, 390 (24.4%) were vaginal deliveries, while 1210 (75.6%) were cesarean sections respectively. Majority 94.8% patients were 20-34 years old, 1.8% were less than or equal to 19 years and 3.4% were great than or equal to 35 years old respectively. The majority of cesarean sections, 814 (67.3%), were performed as elective procedures and 396 (32.7%) were performed as emergency procedures respectively. Majority 512 (42.3%) were performed on women who had a history of previous cesarean deliveries, 34 (2.8%) were performed due to non-progression or prolonged labor, 99 (8.2%) were performed due to malpresentation of the baby and 308 (25.5%) were performed at the request of the mother respectively.

Conclusions: In conclusion, this retrospective observational study provides valuable insights into the prevalence and determinants of caesarean sections in a rural tertiary care hospital.

References

Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, Mane J. Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):251-4.

Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):735-42.

Krychowska A, Kosińska K, Karwan-Płońska A. Comparison of indications for cesarean section in 1985-86 and 2000-01. Analysis of changes. Ginekol Pol. 2004;75(12):926-31.

Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29-38.

Tolla˚nes MC. Increased rate of Caesarean sections-causes and consequences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009;129(13):1329-31.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Heal Rep. 2010;30(1):1-31.

Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing‐Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paed Perin Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98-113.

Canadian Institute for Health Information: Giving Birth in Canada: Providers of Maternity and Infant Care.Ottawa. Canada: CIHI; 2004.

Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bullet W Heal Organiz. 2012;90(1):30-9A.

Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population‐based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2016;123(5):745-53.

Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC MEDI. 2010;8:1-0.

World Health Organization. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021.

Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low‐, medium‐, and high‐income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33(4):270-7.

Ravit M, Mmeje O, Hacker MR, Goodman A. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess Caesarean section delivery preferences in Ethiopia. BMC Pregn Childb. 2017;17(1):102.

Turner MJ. Delivery after one previous caesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;176(4):741-4.

Oladapo OT, Sotunsu JO, Sule-Odu AO. The rise in caesarean birth rate in Sagamu, Nigeria: reflection of changes in obstetrics practice. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;24(4):377-81.

Ba’aqeel. Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(3):179-83.

Stavrou EP, Ford JB, Shand AW, et al. Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study. BMC Pregn Childb. 2011;20(11):8.

Khan MN, Islam MM, Shariff AA, Alam MM, Rahman MM. Socio-demographic predictors and average annual rates of caesarean section in Bangladesh between 2004 and 2014. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177579.

Betra´n AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gu¨lmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(12):1422-7.

Sharma G, Powell-Jackson T, Haldar K. The burden of Cesarean section on demand: Evidence from primary health centers in India. Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(3):252-63.

Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essén B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregn Childb. 2013;8(13):107.

Mehta A, Apers L, Verstraelen H, Temmerman M. Trends in caesarean section rates at a maternity hospital in Mumbai. India J Health Popul Nutr. 2001;19(4):306-12.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles