Study of obstetric and fetal outcomes associated with maternal perception of decreased fetal movements in third trimester

Ishaan S. Padore; Anagha A. Jinturkar

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241078

Authors

Ishaan S. Padore Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, B. J. Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Anagha A. Jinturkar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, B. J. Government Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241078

Keywords:

Decreased fetal movements, Perinatal mortality, BPP

Abstract

Background: Prevalence of decreased fetal movement in third trimester has been reported as 4-15% in various studies. Association between maternal perception of decreased fetal movement and poor perinatal outcome like fetal growth restriction, oligohydramnios, fetal distress, preterm births, fetal congenital anomalies, and stillbirth are revealed in different studies. However, decreased fetal movements may sometimes cause unnecessary anxiety to pregnant women or clinicians leading to unnecessary interventions. Keeping this background, we planned to assess the significance of decreased fetal movement perception in third trimester of pregnancy and its correlation with the perinatal outcome.

Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary health care center B. J. Government Medical College, Pune for a period of 12 months (October 2021-October 2022). Study included 150 mothers with decreased fetal movement in the third trimester. These mothers were monitored till delivery by Repeat fetal movement count, cardiotocography (CTG), ultrasonography (USG), biophysical profile (BPP) and Doppler studies. Mothers were investigated for identification of ante-natal risk factors and their mode of delivery was noted. APGAR score of neonates at birth, birth weight and requirement of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions were also noted.

Results: Study observed that most of these females were primi-mothers belonging to lower socio-economic class. Oligohydramnios, obesity, gestational diabetes and anemia were observed as common risk factors. Emergency caesarean section was required in one out of five cases while one fourth of these mothers delivered pre-term. Most common neonatal complication observed was intra-uterine growth restriction. Mortality rate was 2%.

Conclusions: We thus conclude that mothers with reduced fetal movements are a risk group and should be referred immediately. Overall outcome was good in these babies, when given optimum institutional care.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rayburn WF. Fetal body movement monitoring. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1990;17(1):95-110.

Tuffnell DJ, Cartmill RS, Lilford RJ. Fetal movements; factors affecting their perception. Europe J Obstet Gynaecol Reproduct Biol. 1991;39(3):165-7.

Froen JF. A kick from within- fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(1):13-24.

Sergent F, Lefevre A, Verspyck E, Marpeau L. Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do? Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite. 2005;33(11):861-9.

Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, Alexander S. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2(8650):345-9.

Harrington K, Thompson O, Jordan L, Page J, Carpenter G, Campbell S. Obstetric outcome in women who present with a reduction in fetal movements in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 1998;26(2):77-82.

O’ Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale EA, Heazell AE. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements- a preliminary study. J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;29(8):705-10.

Neldam S, Jessen P. Fetal movements registered by the pregnant woman correlated to retrospective estimations of fetal movements from cardiotocographic tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;136(8):1051-4.

Saastad E, Vangen S, Froen JF. Suboptimal care in stillbirths- a retrospective audit study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):444-50.

Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V, Smyth RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev. 2015;10.

Sheikh M, Hantoushzadeh S, Shariat M. Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements from maternal and fetal perspectives, a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:286.

Nandi N, Agarwal R. Prospective study of maternal perception of decreased fetal movement in third trimester and evaluation of its correlation with perinatal compromise. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:687-91.

Turner JM, Flenady V, Ellwood D, Coory M, Kumar S. Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes among women with decreased fetal movements. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(4):e215071-8.

Tuffnell DJ, Cartmill RS, Lilford RJ. Fetal movements; factors affecting their perception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;39:165-7.

Awad NA, Jordan T, Mundle R, Farine D. Management and Outcome of Reduced Fetal Movements-is Ultrasound Necessary? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:454.

Bellussi F, Po' G, Livi A, Saccone G, De Vivo V, Oliver EA, et al. Fetal Movement Counting and Perinatal Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):453-62.

Heazell AEP, Budd J, Li M, Cronin R, Bradford B, McCowan LME, et al. Alterations in maternally perceived fetal movement and their association with late stillbirth: findings from the Midland and North of England stillbirth case-control study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e020031.