Maternal and fetal outcomes in the absence of antenatal care: a retrospective cohort study

Authors

  • Santi W. C. Lim Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
  • Sharon A. Foo Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
  • Hiu G. Chan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore
  • Manisha Mathur Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241415

Keywords:

Prenatal care, Maternal health services, Perinatal mortality

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care plays a pivotal role in prevention, detection and treatment of pregnancy-related complications and in improving maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, few studies focus on higher income countries and no local studies have been done. This study aims to investigate these outcomes in unbooked pregnancies locally.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study of unbooked pregnant women presenting between January 2015 to December 2019. We compared indicators of maternal and perinatal outcomes between the unbooked group and women receiving routine antenatal care. Modified Poisson regression was used to test the relationship between the booking status of the pregnancy and various outcome indicators.

Results: 50,163 women delivered in the centre, 3% (n=1,525) of whom were unbooked. Unbooked women were more likely to have emergency caesarean sections and were at greater risk of delivering low birth weight babies, requiring blood transfusions (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 2.59, CI 2.17-3.1; p<0.001) and had a 3.74-time risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (CI 2.53-5.52; p<0.001). The maternal mortality rate was roughly 6 per 100,000 live births in the general population compared to 64.3 per 100,000 for the unbooked population.

Conclusions: Although the proportion of unbooked pregnancies are low, these women are more likely to have poorer outcomes and are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Our study highlights the importance of regular antenatal care amongst those at most risk of complications. More work is required to explore reasons for non-engagement to encourage uptake of ANC in this population.

References

Tunçalp, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(6):860-2.

Sarker BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, Rahman T, Khalil JJ, Hasan M, et al. Status of the WHO recommended timing and frequency of antenatal care visits in Northern Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):1-21.

Linard M, Blondel B, Estellat C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Luton D, Oury JF, et al. Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: an analysis in the PreCARE cohort. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(5):587-95.

Moaddab A, Dildy GA, Brown HL, Bateni ZH, Belfort MA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, et al. Health Care Disparity and State-Specific Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2005-2014. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):869-75.

Bouvier-Colle MH, Varnoux N, Salanave B, Ancel PY BG. Case-control study of risk factors for obstetric patients’ admission to intensive care units. Eur J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74:173-7.

Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N, Heinonen S. Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:1-8.

World Health Organisation. WHO Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. 2016. Available at: https:// www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912. Accessed on 10 December 2023.

Herbst MA, Mercer BM, Beazley D, Meyer N, Carr T. Relationship of prenatal care and perinatal morbidity in low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):930-3.

Kapaya H, Mercer E, Boffey F, Jones G, Mitchell C, Anumba D. Deprivation and poor psychosocial support are key determinants of late antenatal presentation and poor fetal outcomes-a combined retrospective and prospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1-9.

Blondel B, Marshall B. Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: Risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(8):501-6.

Bekemeier B, Grembowski D, Yang YR, Herting JR. Local public health delivery of maternal child health services: Are specific activities associated with reductions in black-white mortality disparities? Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(3):615-23.

Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T. “Weighing up and balancing out”: A meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(4):518-29.

Kim MK, Lee SM, Bae SH, Kim HJ, Lim NG, Yoo SJ, et al. Socioeconomic status can affect pregnancy outcomes and complications, even with a universal healthcare system. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):2.

Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Am G. Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;(6):CD012392.

KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital. Obstetrics Clinical Outcomes. 2018. Available at: https://www. kkh.com.sg/about-kkh/corporate-profile/clinical-outcomes/Pages/obstetrics.aspx. Accessed on 10 December 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-29

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles