Acceptance and factors linked with postpartum IUCD use in women delivering at a tertiary care hospital

Divyang S. Bhudhrani; Payal Godria

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241759

Authors

Divyang S. Bhudhrani Bukovinian State Medical University, Teatral'na Square, 2, Chernivtsi, Chernivets'ka Oblast, Ukraine
Payal Godria Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241759

Keywords:

Acceptance, Intrauterine contraceptive device, Post-partum family planning

Abstract

Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) offer highly effective, reliable, non-hormonal, and immediately reversible contraception, with no adverse impact on lactation. Despite these advantages, their acceptance remains low, with factors influencing rejection not fully understood, particularly in specific regions like Vadodara. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and associated factors of immediate PPIUCD use among women in SSG hospital, Vadodara.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1^st to 30^th March 2024, involving 170 postpartum women in SSG hospital, Vadodara. Participants were selected using a systematic approach, and data were collected through structured questionnaires.

Results: Acceptance of immediate PPIUCD usage was found to be 12.7%. Reasons for non-acceptance included concerns about complications (24.8%), bad experience in the past (10℅), and husband’s refusal (17.7%). Women with secondary education were more likely to accept PPIUCD, as were those who attended four or more antenatal care visits.

Conclusions: Despite the benefits of immediate PPIUCD, its acceptance remains low, influenced by educational level, concerns about complications, and cultural factors such as male partner’s refusal and religious beliefs. Enhancing women’s education and providing effective counselling during antenatal care visits are crucial for addressing misconceptions and fears surrounding PPIUCD, thereby promoting its utilization in postpartum family planning.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):121-37.

Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012;380(9837):149-56.

RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements, interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;34(4):227-48.

Callegari LS, Nelson KM, Aron DC, Kuehl TJ, Bonnell CJ, Espinosa de los Monteros K. Factors associated with willingness to try long-acting reversible contraceptives among women attending an abortion clinic. Contraception. 2011;84(6):585-90.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):920-7.

Sharma A, Gupta V. A study of awareness and factors affecting acceptance of PPIUCD in south-East Rajasthan. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(8):2706-10.

Sidhu TK, Coonar PS. Contraceptive usage and awareness among postpartum mothers in urban field practice area of a tertiary hospital. Indian J Community Health. 2015;27(1):139-42.

Jairaj S, Dayyala S. A cross-sectional study on acceptability and safety of IUCD among postpartum mothers at tertiary care hospital, Telangana. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):4-7.

Kumari S, Goyal N. Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices, Zenana Hospital, Jaipur. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(5):401-9.

Singh S, Darroch JE. Adding it up: costs and benefits of contraceptive services estimates for 2012. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.

National Health Mission Family Planning India Annual Report, 2015-16. Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/family-planing/annual-report/annual-report-fp-division-2015-16.pdf. Accessed on 12 February 2024.

Doley RPB. A retrospective study on acceptability and complications of PPIUCD insertion. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(31):1631-4.

Kant S, Archana S, Singh AK, Ahamed F, Haldar P. Acceptance rate, probability of follow-up, and expulsion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device offered at two primary health centers, North India. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2016;5(4):770-6.

Yadav S, Joshi R, Solanki M. Knowledge attitude practice and acceptance of postpartum intrauterine devices among postpartal women in a tertiary care center. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1507-10.

Nayak AK, Jain MK. Experience on Awareness, Acceptability, Safety, Efficacy. Complications and expulsion of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Int J Sci Stud. 2017;5(1):207-12.

Sharma A, Gupta V. A study of awareness and factors affecting acceptance of PPIUCD in South-East Rajasthan. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(8):2706-10.