A study of different routes of hysterectomies and its outcome in benign gynaecological conditions in tertiary care centre in Tamil Nadu

Authors

  • Kiruthika Arumugam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Shery A. Rajakumar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-2711
  • Janarthanan Kumar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chengalpattu Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5170-6391

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242070

Keywords:

Hysterectomy, Benign gynaecological conditions, Surgical approaches, Complications, Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the most frequently performed major surgical procedure in gynaecology. It is an efficacious treatment option for numerous gynaecological conditions. This study aimed to investigate the different routes of hysterectomies, such as abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic, and their outcomes in benign gynaecological diseases in a tertiary care centre in Tamil Nadu.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 200 patients who were admitted to the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu, India underwent hysterectomy between January 2021 and January 2023, and were collected from the MRD. Patient history included age, parity, indication for surgery, duration of surgery, route of hysterectomy, intraoperative or postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay were collected.

Results: This study analysed 200 patients who underwent hysterectomy, with the majority aged between 40-50 years (60%) and multiparous women (85%). The most common indications were abnormal uterine bleeding (80%), uterine prolapse (12%), benign ovarian cyst (5%) and post-menopausal bleeding (3%). Total abdominal hysterectomy (49%) was the most common approach, followed by vaginal/non-descent hysterectomy (19.5%), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (16.5%), and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (15%). Complications included wound infections (3.5%), excessive bleeding (3%), bladder injuries (1%) and ureter injury (0.5%). The procedure duration and hospital stay were shorter for vaginal and laparoscopic approaches than for open abdominal hysterectomy. The laparoscopic approach had the lowest rates of complications such as bladder injuries and excessive bleeding.

Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy is preferred for uterine prolapse, whereas laparoscopic techniques offer benefits such as reduced blood loss and lesser hospital stay and morbidities. Although rare, complications emphasize the need for careful postoperative monitoring to optimize patient care.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kovac SR. Route of hysterectomy: an evidence-based approach. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:58-71.

Sutton C. Hysterectomy: a historical perspective. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11:1-22.

Prasad DR, Nair NV. Retrospective analysis of elective hysterectomy cases in a tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:3714.

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5.

Rimsza ME. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Pediatr Rev. 2002;23:227-33.

Nausheen F, Iqbal J, Bhatti FA, Khan AT, Sheikh S. Hysterectomy: The patients perspective. AnnKing Edward Med Univ. 2004;10.

Chryssikopoulos A, Loghis C. Indications and results of total hysterectomy. Int Surg. 1986;71:188-94.

Lee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:2837.

Singh A, Arora AK. Why Hysterectomy Rate are Lower in India. Indian J Community Med. 2008;33:196-7.

Shergill SK, Shergill HK, Gupta M, Kaur S. Clinicopathological study of hysterectomies. J Indian Med Assoc. 2002;100:238-9.

Goldstein SR, Lumsden MA. Abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopause. Climacteric. 2017;20:414-20.

Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:654-73.

Müller A, Thiel FC, Renner SP, Winkler M, Häberle L, Beckmann MW. Hysterectomy-a comparison of approaches. DtschArztebl Int. 2010;107:353-9.

David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Darai E. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Human Reproduction. 2007;22:260-51.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Arumugam, K., Rajakumar, S. A., & Kumar, J. (2024). A study of different routes of hysterectomies and its outcome in benign gynaecological conditions in tertiary care centre in Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13(8), 2056–2059. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242070

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles