A retrospective observational study to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes with instrumental delivery in tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Kavitha D. Nayak Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242073

Keywords:

Forceps, Instrumental delivery, Vacuum

Abstract

Background: In modern obstetrics, the number of vaginal deliveries is reducing, and instrumental delivery are still reduced. This could be due to need for obstetrician skill for instrumental delivery, increased perineal tears or foetal injuries. The objective of this study was to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes with instrumental delivery.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study conducted in tertiary care hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. In this study, 31 cases of forceps delivery and 15 cases of vacuum were studied for maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: The total number of deliveries were 2693 and vaginal deliveries were 999 and instrumental deliveries were 46. It was observed that most patients (86.9%) requiring instruments in the second stage were primigravida. The most common indication for instrumental delivery is both fetal distress and poor maternal bearing down efforts. The maternal complications were more with forceps and included extension of episiotomy in 5 cases, third degree perineal tear in 6 cases, 2 cases of hematoma- one case of broad ligament hematoma and 2 patients required blood transfusion. The neonatal complications were more with forceps. However, the outcomes were favourable. We did not have any case of HIE stage 3, no baby required intubation. 3 babies with forceps had poor Apgar at birth and HIE stage 1.

Conclusions: Instrumental delivery is relatively a safe and good option provided all the criteria are met. With proper technique, we can reduce the maternal complications as well.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bhosale A, Nayak AH, Mehandale M, Doshi B. A prospective observational study to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcome of forceps delivery in a tertiary care government hospital. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;4(4):08-11.

Shekhar S, Rana N, Jaswal RS. A prospective randomized study comparing maternal and fetal effects of forceps delivery and vacuum extraction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63(2):116-9.

Shamsa A, Jun Bai J, Raviraj P, Gyaneshwar R. Mode of delivery and its associated maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2013;3(3):307-12.

Singh A, Rathore P. A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;61(6):663-6.

Akhtar S. Comparison of maternal and infant outcome between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Pak Arm Forc Medi J. 2006;2(1):25-31.

Johnson JH, Figueroa R, Garry D, Elimian A, Maulik D. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):513-8.

Nkwabong E, Nana PN, Mbu R, Takang W, Ekono MR, Kouam L. Indications and maternofetal outcome of instrumental deliveries at the University Teaching Hospital of Yaounde, Cameroon. Trop Doct. 2011;41(1):5-7.

Talukdar S, Purandare N, Coulter-Smith S, Geary M. Is it time to rejuvenate the forceps? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63(4):218-22.

Kovavisarach E, Varanuntakul T. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction. J Med Assoc Thai. 1999;82(4):319.

Wu Wen S, Shiliang L, Kramer SM, Marcoux S, Ohlsson A, Sauvé R, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(2):103-7.

Ebulue V, Vadalkar J, Cely S, Dopwell F, Yoong W. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8.

CoP BO. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):e56-65.

Caughey AB, Sandberg PL, Zlatnik MG, Thiet MP, Parer JT, Laros Jr RK. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;107(3):740.

Lawani LO, Anozie OB, Ezeonu PO, Iyoke CA. Comparison of outcomes between operative vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries in southeast Nigeria. Intern J Gynecol Obstetr. 2014;125(3):206-9.

Lurie S, Glezerman M, Sadan O. Maternal and neonatal effects of forceps versus vacuum operative vaginal delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2005;89(3):293-4.

Demissie K, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, Balasubramanian BA, Gandhi K, Joseph KS, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):24.

Lambda A, Kaur R, Muzafar Z. An observational study to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcome of forceps delivery in a tertiary care government hospital of a cosmopolitan city of India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(2):292-5.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

How to Cite

Nayak, K. D. (2024). A retrospective observational study to assess the maternal and neonatal outcomes with instrumental delivery in tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13(8), 2070–2074. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242073

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles