Awareness and acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices amongst women in reproductive age group in an urbanized village of South Delhi

Authors

  • Suresh M. Department of Community Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Shalini Smanla Department of Community Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Namita Srivastava Department of Community Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20242811

Keywords:

Awareness, Acceptance, Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device

Abstract

Background: In India, grappling with a population surge, about 48.1 million pregnancies are unintended, highlighting the critical need for effective postpartum family planning (PPFP) to prevent adverse outcomes. Despite the postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) benefits as a non-hormonal, reversible contraceptive, its uptake is hindered by various barriers. This study examines the awareness and acceptance of PPIUCD among women in the reproductive age group of South Delhi.

Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted at the field practice area under the Department of Community Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. Under this study, 190 women of reproductive age groups were included. The data was collected regarding awareness and acceptance of PPIUCD. The reason for acceptance and non-acceptance was collected. Data entered and analysed in Microsoft excel.

Results: Out of 190 women of reproductive age,73% were aware of PPIUCD, and only 28% had accepted the PPIUCD. A statistically significant association between awareness and acceptance of PPIUCD was found. The most common reason for not accepting the PPIUCD was lack of awareness, followed by fear of complication. The reason for acceptance of PPIUCD was exposure to counselling and awareness that it was long-acting and reversible. The most common reason for the removal of PPIUCD is abdominal pain followed by bleeding. The statistically significant association between place of delivery and awareness and acceptance of PPIUCD was found.

Conclusion: During the present study, it was found that Awareness and acceptance of PPIUCD was 73% and 28% of the women of reproductive age, respectively.

References

Sharma H, Singh SK. The burden of unintended pregnancies among Indian adolescent girls in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh: findings from the UDAYA survey (2015–16 and 2018–19). Arch Public Health. 2023;81(1):75.

National Estimate of Abortion in India Released. 2024. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org. Accessed on 17th December 2023.

Biswas M, Banerjee A. Examining the linkages between maternity services and postpartum modern contraceptive adoption among young women in India: Insights from the 2015-16 and 2019-22. National Family Heal Surv. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(8):289701.

Jima GH, Kaso MK, Biesma-Blanco RG, Sendekie TY, Stekelenburg J. Factors associated with modern contraceptives uptake during the first year after birth in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(2):270055.

Roy N, Adhikary P, Kabra R, Kiarie J, Mburu G, Dhabhai N, et al. Postpartum contraceptive practices among urban and peri-urban women in North India: a mixed-methods cohort study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:820.

Srivastava U, Pandey A, Singh P, Singh KK. A study on initiation of postpartum family planning in India based on NFHS-4: does urban poor differ significantly from rural? BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):472.

Rani K, Pangtey N, Khanna G, Rani M. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) insertion: practices and aftermath at tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:4742.

Najan A, Dixit P, Bhalerao A. The acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices among women who receive focused family planning counseling in the antenatal period compared to those who receive routine counseling: a randomized controlled trial. Cureus. 2017;15(6):40344.

Gonie A, Worku C, Assefa T, Bogale D, Girma A. Acceptability and factors associated with post-partum IUCD use among women who gave birth at bale zone health facilities, Southeast-Ethiopia. Contracept Reprod Med. 2018;3:16.

Sinha T. Barriers and challenges in the acceptance and continuation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device. in: contemporary challenges in postnatal care. Intech Open. 2023. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com. Accessed on 17th December 2023.

Gudi SN, Sachdeva J, Manchanda R, Mani M, Sinha SRR, Sinha S, et al. A prospective multi-centric Study of Acceptance, Insertion and Follow-Up of Postpartum Insertions of IUCD. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023;73(3):254-61.

Alukal AT, Raveendran RC, George L. PPIUCD: awareness and reasons for non-acceptance. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(2):582-7.

Sharma A, Gupta V. A study of awareness and factors affecting acceptance of PPIUCD in South-East Rajasthan. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4:2706.

Deshpande S, Gadappa S, Yelikar K, Wanjare N, Andurkar S. Awareness, acceptability and clinical outcome of post-placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in Marathwada region, India. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 4(1):77-82.

Goswami G, Yadav K, Patel A. A prospective study to evaluate safety, efficacy and expulsion rate of post placental insertion of Intra Uterine Device. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4(56):9770-5.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles