Comparative study to evaluate intravenous iron sucrose with oral ferrous sulphate for treatment of anaemia in pregnancy

Authors

  • Shazia Anjum Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and Associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi, India
  • Sweta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and Associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi, India
  • Vandana Saini Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hindu Rao Hospital and Associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243171

Keywords:

Iron deficiency anemia, Iron sucrose, Oral iron therapy

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of oral iron and intravenous iron in improving haemoglobin in iron deficiency anemia.

Methods: This was randomised controlled trial conducted on 100 pregnant women who attended Gynaecology & Obstetrics OPD for antenatal check-up in June 2019 to May 2020 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, New Delhi. All pregnant women at gestation age 20 to 32 weeks with confirmed diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia were divided into two groups. In the group A, oral iron was given and in the group B, intravenous iron sucrose was given in divided doses. Haemoglobin was checked after 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. For both groups paired sample test is applied and comparison (in term of rise in haemoglobin from pre to post) of both groups was found to be significant. The results were analyzed by student’s t-test and chi-square test.

Results: Haemoglobin values were found to be increased in both the groups at 2nd 4th and 6th weeks. When both the groups were compared the rise in the values was higher in the IV iron sucrose group 1.6gm than oral iron 0.8gm after two weeks of treatment.

Conclusions: Intravenous iron sucrose treated iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy faster and more effectively than oral iron without serious side effects.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

World Health Organization. Global data based on Anemia: Geneva, World Health Organization, 2008. Available at: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.ANAEMIAWOMENPWv. Accessed on 17th March 2024.

National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21 for India, 2022. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf. Accessed 01 August 2024.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Guidelines for Control of Iron Deficiency Anemia, 2021. Available at: https://www.nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/child-health/guidelines/Control-of-Iron-Deficiency-Anaemia.pdf. Accessed 01 August 2024.

Milman N. Prepartum anaemia: prevention and treatment. Ann Hematol. 2008;87:949-59.

Kochhar PK, Kaundal A, Ghosh P. Intravenous ironsucrose versus oral iron in treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(2):504-10.

Prasanth R. Prevalence of anemia in both developing and developed countries around the world. World J Anemia. 2017;1(2):40-3.

Bayoumeu F, Subiran-Buisset C, Baka NE, Legagneur H, Monnier-Barbarino P, Laxenaire MC. Iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: intravenous route versus oral route. Euro J Obstetr Gynecol Reproduct Biolo. 2005;123:S15-9.

Neeru S, Nair NS, Rai L. Iron sucrose versus oral iron therapy in pregnancy anemia. Ind J Comm Med. 2012;37(4):214-8.

Agarwal N, Sharma A, Gupta M, Agrawal A. Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron inpregnant women with mild to moderate iron deficiency anaemia. Academia Edu. 2016;2(2):109-11.

Srilatha J. Prevalence of anemia in pregnant mothers and their outcome: a study in a semi urban area. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):4886-9.

Suganya G, Vimala D. A comparative study of oral iron and intravenous iron in iron deficient antenatal mothers”. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(5):1848-51.

Gupta A, Manaktala U, Rathore AM. A randomised controlled trial to compare intravenous iron sucrose and oral iron in treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Ind J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014;30:120-5.

Parmar M, Vaghela H, Shah PT, Thakar RV, Deliwala KJ. Evaluation of effectiveness of intravenous iron sucrose in antenatal patients of iron deficiency anemia. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:173-6.

Tripathi S, Pradhan A. Intravenous iron versus oral iron in antenatal women with iron deficiency anemia in Sub-Himalayan settings. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2015;2:5832-8.

Froessler B, Cocchiaro C, Saadat-Gilani K, Hodyl N, Dekker G. Intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron ferrous sulfate for antenatal and postpartum iron deficiency anemia” a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(7):654-9.

Kriplani A, Mahey R, Bhusan B D, Kulshreshta V, Agarwal N, Bhatla N. Intravenous iron sucrose therapy for moderate to severe anaemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res 2013;138(1):78-82. .

Al RA, Unlubilgin E, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Cakir L, Haberal A. Intravenous versus oral iron for treatment of anemia in pregnancy: a randomized trial. Obstetr Gynecol. 2005;106(6):1335-40.

Al-Momen AK, Al-Meshari A, Al-Nuaim L, Saddique A, Abotalib Z, Khashogji T, et al. Intravenous iron sucrose complex in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;69(2):121-4.

Bhavi SB, Jaju PB. Intravenous iron sucrose v/s oral ferrous fumarate for treatment of anemia in pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnan Childb. 2017;17:1-6.

Kalaivani K. Prevalence and consequences of anemia in pregnancy. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130(5):627-33.

Bayoumeu F, Subiran-Buisset C, Baka NE, Legagneur H, Monnier-Barbarino P, Laxenaire MC. Iron therapy in iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: intravenous route versus oral route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:518-22.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Anjum, S., Sweta, & Saini, V. (2024). Comparative study to evaluate intravenous iron sucrose with oral ferrous sulphate for treatment of anaemia in pregnancy. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13(11), 3171–3174. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243171

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles