A randomized controlled trial comparing labor induction at 40 versus 41 weeks in low-risk post-date pregnant women

Authors

  • Anjali Soni Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr R. P. Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Divya Khurana Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr R. P. Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Chanderdeep Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252318

Keywords:

Foley’s catheter, Induction of labor, Post-date pregnancy, 40 weeks, 41 weeks

Abstract

Background: To determine effect of expectant management till 41 weeks versus labor induction (IOL) at 40 weeks, on spontaneous labor onset (SOL), in low-risk post-date (>40 weeks) women.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among low-risk post-date women. At enrolment two hundred women were randomized (group 1; IOL at 40 weeks versus group 2; expectant management till 41 weeks). Demographic and clinical data were collected at enrolment and delivery.

Results: Three-fourth of women (76%) in group 2 had SOL. Additionally, duration of labor (minutes) [median±IQR; 380 (325-417) versus 410 (380-482), p<0.001], delivery within 12 hours (n; 87 versus 45, p<0.001) and within 12-24 hours of admission (n; 1 versus 42, p<0.001) was statistically significantly better in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference regarding mode of delivery (n) [vaginal delivery; 87 vs. 88, or cesarean section (CS); 13 versus 12, p=0.887] and indications of CS (fetal distress; 12 versus 12, and failure of induction of labor 1 versus nil, p=1.000) and maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. With an absolute risk of 21% of SOL, five women should be offered expectant management till 41 weeks for one woman to have SOL.

Conclusions: In low- and middle-income countries, low-risk post-date pregnant women should be offered expectant management of pregnancy till 41 weeks awaiting spontaneous labor (76%), with maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes comparable to routine IOL at 40 weeks.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Soni A, Sharma A, Sharma C, Verma S. Simultaneous use of high-volume Foley catheter (60 ml) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;158(1):44-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13943

WHO recommendations on induction of labour, at or beyond term 5 October 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240055780. Accessed on 26 December 2022.

Senanayake H, Mariani I, Valente EP, Piccoli M, Armocida B, Businelli C, et al. Outcomes of induction versus spontaneous onset of labour at 40 and 41 GW: findings from a prospective database, Sri Lanka. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04800-1

Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD004945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5

Berghella V, Bellusi F, Schoen CN. Evidence-based labor management: induction of labor (part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100136

Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ. 2012;344(7857):e2838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2838

Solone M, Shaw KA. Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(2):107-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000608

Saccone G, Della Corte L, Maruotti GM, Nelson JQ, Raffone A, Vivo VD et al. Induction of labor at full‐term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:958-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13561

Parikh LI, Reddy UM, Männistö T, Mendola P, Sjaarda L, Hinkle S, et al. Neonatal outcomes in early term birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):265.e1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.021

Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800566

Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Salvesen KA. Induction of labour for post-term pregnancy and risk estimates for intrauterine and perinatal death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):247-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340701743165

WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272447/WHO-RHR-18.12-eng.pdf. Accessed on 26 December2002.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

Soni, A., Khurana, D., & Sharma, C. (2025). A randomized controlled trial comparing labor induction at 40 versus 41 weeks in low-risk post-date pregnant women. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(8), 2518–2525. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252318

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles