Impact of trigger protocol and embryo transfer type on IVF pregnancy outcomes: a single-center, retrospective, observational study

Authors

  • Selvamani Divya Srushti Fertility Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sankari Samundi Srushti Fertility Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Gunapati Mithilasri Srushti Fertility Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Hemapriya A. S. ChemPharma Pvt Ltd, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243944

Keywords:

Dual vs single trigger, Fresh & frozen embryo transfers, IVF outcomes

Abstract

Background: Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of regular, unprotected intercourse, affects over 186 million people globally, with a significant burden in developing countries. Assisted reproductive technology (ART), particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF), has evolved as a key intervention for infertility, with advancements such as ovulation triggers playing a crucial role. This study investigates the effectiveness of single versus dual trigger methods between fresh and frozen embryo transfers and their impact on IVF outcomes.

Methods: This observational study was conducted at Srushti Fertility Centre and Women’s Hospital from 2022 to 2023. A consecutive sampling of 140 participants undergoing ART was performed, categorizing them into Single Trigger (n=48) and Dual Trigger (n=92) groups. Key parameters such as age, hormonal levels (AMH, FSH, LH), endometrial thickness, and serum progesterone levels were measured and analyzed in relation to IVF outcomes.

Results: The study found that optimal endometrial thickness (8-9 mm, p=0.031) and low progesterone levels (<0.5 ng/mL, p=0.003) were significantly associated with positive IVF outcomes. Fresh transfers with low progesterone levels (p=0.016) and dual trigger methods produced better embryo development. However, IVF outcomes did not differ significantly between fresh and frozen embryo transfers (p=0.276).

Conclusions: The dual trigger method, especially with frozen transfers, enhances embryo quality and pregnancy rates. However, overall differences between frozen and fresh transfers were not statistically significant, emphasizing individualized hormonal management for better outcomes. This study highlights the importance of optimizing endometrial thickness and managing progesterone levels to improve pregnancy success in ART.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Infertility. Available at: www.who.int/news-room. Accessed on 21 August 2024.

Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century | Human Reproduction Update.Oxford Academi. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/humupd. Accessed on 22 Auguts 2024.

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):1001356.

Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1144–7.

Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10.

Carson SA, Kallen AN. Diagnosis and Management of Infertility. JAMA. 2021;326(1):65–76.

Jain M, Singh M. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Techniques. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed on 24 August 2024.

Kessler MJ, Reddy MS, Shah RH, Bahl OP. Structures of N-glycosidic carbohydrate units of human chorionic gonadotropin. J Biol Chem. 1979;254(16):7901–8.

Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grøndahl ML, Westergaard L, et al. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2003;20(5):1213–20.

Nakano R, Mizuno T, Kotsuji F, Katayama K, Washio M, Tojo S. “Triggering” of ovulation after infusion of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing factor (LRF). Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 1973;52(3):269-72.

Diedrich K, Diedrich C, Santos E, Zoll C, al-Hasani S, Reissmann T, et al. Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1994;9(5):788–91.

Humaidan P, Westergaard LG, Mikkelsen AL, Fukuda M, Yding Andersen C. Levels of the epidermal growth factor-like peptide amphiregulin in follicular fluid reflect the mode of triggering ovulation: a comparison between gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2034–8.

Segal S, Casper RF. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin for triggering follicular maturation in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and sterility. 1992;57(6):1254-8.

Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Thomas S. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with a reduced dose of human chorionic gonadotropin for final oocyte maturation in fresh autologous cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertility and sterility. 2008;90(1):231-3.

Lin MH, Wu FSY, Lee RKK, Li SH, Lin SY, Hwu YM. Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1296–302.

Lu X, Hong Q, Sun L, Chen Q, Fu Y, Ai A, et al. Dual trigger for final oocyte maturation improves the oocyte retrieval rate of suboptimal responders to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;106(6):1356-62.

Xu J, Zhang S, Jin L, Mao Y, Shi J, Huang R, et al. The effects of endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of over 40,000 cycles among five reproductive centers in China. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:788706.

Eleftheriadou A, Francis A, Wilcox M, Jayaprakasan K. Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer: comparison of protocols and factors influencing outcome. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):737.

Yan MH, Cao JX, Hou JW, Jiang WJ, Wang DD, Sun ZG, et al. GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final oocyte maturation in Expected Normal Responders with a high immature oocyte rate: Study Protocol for a Randomized, superiority, Parallel Group, Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Endocrinol. 2022;13:831859.

Pitner I, Mikuš M, Šprem Goldštajn M, Laganà AS, Chiantera V, Ferrari F, et al. Effects of different progesterone levels on reproductive outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies: from molecular basis to treatment strategies. Gynecological Endocrinol. 2023;39(1):2190806.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Divya, S., Samundi, S., Mithilasri, G., & A. S., H. (2024). Impact of trigger protocol and embryo transfer type on IVF pregnancy outcomes: a single-center, retrospective, observational study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(1), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243944

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles