A comparative study of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology classification systems in the diagnosis and management of Müllerian anomalies: insights from a case series

Madhu Priya V.; Priyanka Peethamabaran; Sujata N. Datti

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250878

Authors

Madhu Priya V. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Priyanka Peethamabaran Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Sujata N. Datti Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250878

Keywords:

Mullerian anomalies, ESHRE, ASRM

Abstract

Mullerian anomalies, congenital malformations of the female genital tract, arise from defective development, fusion, or resorption of Mullerian ducts and contribute to infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and primary amenorrhea. With a prevalence of 6.7% in the general population, accurate classification and diagnosis are crucial for effective management. This study compares the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) classification systems using a prospective analysis of 12 cases. The ASRM’s simplicity contrasts with the ESHRE’s anatomical precision, but the latter struggles with complex anomalies. Findings reveal 41% of cases classified as hypoplastic uterus under ESHRE, with 25% remaining unclassifiable under ASRM. The study underscores the limitations of current systems in addressing complex anomalies involving vaginal and cervical deviations. It calls for a universal classification system integrating embryology, anatomy, and clinical insights for better diagnosis and treatment.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn018

Vyas RC, Kaur S, Kaur S. A study of Mullerian anomalies in cases presenting with primary amenorrhea. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(2):440-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190265

Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1

Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098

Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellermann A. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):792-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei381

Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Leitão VM, et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):101-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18923

Kumar S, Satija B, Wadhwa L. Complex Mullerian duct anomaly in a young female with primary amenorrhoea, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(3):295-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.106345

Li S, Qayyam A, Coakley FV, Hricak H. Association of renal agenesis and Müllerian duct anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;6:829-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200011000-00001

Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Coelho Neto MA. Accuracy of 3D sonography in diagnosing Müllerian anomalies using ESHRE/ESGE consensus on female genital tract congenital anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(6):791-8.

Laufer MR. Diagnosis and management of reproductive tract anomalies in adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):891-905.

Banerjee S, Mitra S. Prevalence and diagnostic approach of Müllerian anomalies in reproductive-aged women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(2):137-41.

Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, Bhagavath B, Lindheim SR, et al. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(6):800-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20291