Placental location and fetomaternal outcome: a prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251961Keywords:
Placental location, Fetomaternal outcome, Hypertensive disorders, NICU admissions, Pregnancy outcomesAbstract
Background: The placental position within the uterus can significantly influence pregnancy outcomes, impacting maternal and fetal well-being. It has been associated with complications such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Understanding how different placental locations affect pregnancy outcomes is essential for optimizing clinical management and improving maternal and neonatal health. Objective of this study was to assess the effect of placental location on maternal and fetal outcomes.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, over 12 months from June 2023 to May 2024. 120 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies over 18 weeks of gestation were recruited. After determining placental location via ultrasonography, the participants were divided into three groups: anterior (n=53), posterior (n=46), and lateral (n=21). Maternal and fetal outcomes were assessed and analysed using SPSS software (version 23), with a p-value of less than 0.05, considered statistically significant.
Results: The most common placental location was anterior (44.1%), followed by posterior (38.3%) and lateral (17.5%). A significant association was observed between lateral placental location and hypertensive disorders including per-eclampsia (p=0.01), while anterior placental location was significantly associated with a higher incidence of PPROM/PROM (p=0.002). Regarding fetal outcomes, lateral placentation was significantly associated with IUGR (p=0.01). Although NICU admission rates were higher in the anterior placental group (35.8%), no significant correlation was found between placental location and neonatal outcomes.
Conclusions: Placental location, particularly lateral positioning, is significantly associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, including hypertensive disorders and IUGR. Anterior placental location showed a strong association with PPROM/PROM. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings and refine clinical management strategies for pregnancies with abnormal placental locations.
Metrics
References
Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33(4):244-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.010
Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Placental oxidative stress: from miscarriage to preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017;77(4):1.
Kingdom JC, Audette MC, Hobson SR. Placental vascular development and fetal growth. J Physiol. 2020;598(23):5357-74.
Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Maternal-fetal medicine: recent trends and developments. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(2):175-6.
Rasmussen S, Irgens LM. Placenta weight and birthweight: does the association differ between pregnancies with and without preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(3):273.e1-273.e8.
Abramowicz JS, Sheiner E. Ultrasound of the placenta: a systematic approach. Part I: imaging. Placenta. 2008;29(3):225-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2007.12.006
Zia S. Placental location and pregnancy outcome. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013;14(4):190-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2013.92609
Turco MY, Moffett A. Development of the human placenta. Development. 2019;146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.163428
Schmidt P, Skelly CL, Raines DA. Placental abruption. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64:700-9.
Singh G, Sabnani S, Navriya SC. Monstrous invasion of placenta percreta and previa: multidisciplinary management of a case, the role of a urologist, and a literature review. Cureus. 2022;14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28537
Chew LC, Osuchukwu OO, Reed DJ. Fetal growth restriction. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2016;10:67-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4137/CMPed.S40070
Nair VV, Nair SS, Radhamany K. Study of placental location and pregnancy outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(4):1393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20191187
Sitimani A, Sai BP, Narendra B, Prabhudev P. Study of correlation between fetomaternal outcome with placental location at a tertiary hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(3):803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20220560
Chhabra S, Srujana D, Tyagi S, Kutchi I, Yadav Y. Maternal neonatal outcome in relation to placental location, dimensions in early pregnancy. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. 2013;2(2):105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-960X.118651
Fung TY, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Leung TY, Chan LW, Chung TK. Placental site in the second trimester of pregnancy and its association with subsequent obstetric outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(6):548-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2740
Hadley CB, Main DM, Gabbe SG. Risk factors for preterm premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2008;7(4):374-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-999527
Seckin KD, Cakmak B, Karsli MF, Yeral MI, Gultekin IB, Oz M, et al. Is lateral localisation of placenta a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(7):696-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2015.1007343
Kalanithi LEG, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB, Frisbæk Y, Abdel-Razeq S, Copel JA, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental location. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(11):1481-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2007.26.11.1481
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
