Labour epidural analgesia and maternal and neonatal outcome

Authors

  • Rani V. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arokya Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Swathi Natarajan Department of Anesthesia, Arokya Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250189

Keywords:

Epidural analgesia, Labor analgesia, Maternal and neonatal outcome

Abstract

Background: This study was done to determine the maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturient who were administered with labour epidural analgesia. Primary objectives include the comparison of time to deliver after insertion of the epidural catheter at less than 4 cm and more than 4 cm of cervical dilatation, to determine the requirement of assistance for normal vaginal delivery, and also to determine adverse maternal outcomes.

Methods: The study was conducted at Arokya Women’s Centre, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The data was collected from medical records department, between July 2023 and June 2024. After obtaining written and informed consent, 749 parturient, who were willing for receiving labour epidural analgesia, were included in our study.

Results: In our study, majority of the parturient received labour epidural analgesia during their first stage of labour, i.e. less than 4 cm of cervical dilatation. The time to deliver in this age group is found to be more 465.4±393.3 minutes, as compared to those who were provided with labour epidural analgesia during their second stage of labour, 130.4±184, which was statistically significant (p value- 0.000).

Conclusions: We conclude that labour epidural analgesia, when administered between 1 and 4 cm of cervical dilatation, was helpful for parturient to have a pain-free, quicker delivery. We also observed that labour epidural did not cause an increased occurrence of post-partum haemorrhage among parturient and NICU admission among neonates.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Chestnut DH, Wong CA, Tsen LC, Ngan Kee WD, Beillin Y, Mhyre JM, et al. Chestnut’s Obstetric Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice. 6th edn. Elsevier; 2020:422.

Hosagoudar P, Vimala KR, Bhaskar U, Reddy VS, Krishna L. The effects of epidural analgesia in normal labour. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2018;5(3):g407-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-4994.2018.0077

Sengodan SS, Sharona D. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcome in heart disease complicating pregnancy in tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(3):1234-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200906

Callahan EC, Lee W, Aleshi P, George RB. Modern labor epidural analgesia: implications for labor outcomes and maternal-fetal health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1260-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.017

Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:970-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70669-1

Guglielminotti J, Landau R, Daw J, Friedman AM, Chihuri S, Li G. Use of labor neuraxial analgesia for vaginal delivery and severe maternal morbidity. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;1(5):e220137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0137

He FY, Wang S. Epidural analgesia for labor: effects on length of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:130-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-29

How to Cite

V., R., & Natarajan, S. (2025). Labour epidural analgesia and maternal and neonatal outcome. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(2), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250189

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles